It will suck.
You've just listed your personal arguments. You're interested in the movie because of the main actress and the brand that supports the movie. If you have faith in both based on good things they've done in the past, that's all you need to justify yourself.
Movies are a subjective topic because they're designed around subjective views. I'd argue there are basics every movie requires, such as relatable characters that are developed, solid plot and story and proper explanation if things are found lacking.
In the end, there will be people who like Adam Sandler movies.
/shrugs
It looks like it could be the best DC movie yet. then again, a time lapse of a corpse rotting in the sun could probably take the title at this point.
O Flora, of the moon, of the dream. O Little ones, O fleeting will of the ancients. Let the hunter be safe. Let them find comfort. And let this dream, their captor, Foretell a pleasant awakening
Noooope! She can't act. Also, did a quick IMDB search, the story is written by Zack Snyder and the screen play is by some dude I've never heard of whose only writing credits over the last decade are a scattering of episodes from a bunch of crappy tv shows, same for the director. So let me elaborate a little more.
Noooooooope!
Last edited by Thoughtcrime; 2017-05-22 at 02:21 PM.
I haven't cared for anything that's been done with the DC universe. Except for the dark knight movies.
Kom graun, oso na graun op. Kom folau, oso na gyon op.
#IStandWithGinaCarano
movie with be a hit critically and financially
Be feared, or be fuel
She was the only cool thing in Batman VS Superman, I like the character and I think she's the right actress to portray her (completely unrelated to the fact that she's hot af), but I'm not blind to the many fails of DC stuff lately so I dont really wanna keep my hopes too high and just be disappointed.
(but secretly I'm hyped for Wonder Woman)
How so?
I was simply pointing out that even though movies are a subjective topic there are basic requirements.
Think of it as looking at a painting. If there's no frame or paint, it's not a painting.
Same with movies. If it's so unimmersive that you can't even identify it as a movie, or even worse, everything is put so clearly into scene that you can only think of the characters as 'actors', it's basically not a movie.
You don't have to uphold the values I require to be immersed in a movie, but anyone will find it lacking if you can't even identify it as a movie.
1: Because I've seen her try? She's awful, has zero charisma. She's just good looking.
2: He's involved in the story, he can't write. That there are multiple writers is creatively much WORSE. Tolstoy didn't have a bunch of hacks writing chapters for him.
3: Note that I said "over the last decade"
The film may be a 'hit' in the commercial sense just like a lot of Adam Sandler and Transformer movies are. But it's still shit.