Shout out to the Trump supporters who took their time to comment.
Follow up question
what makes Trump more credible than others?
Shout out to the Trump supporters who took their time to comment.
Follow up question
what makes Trump more credible than others?
Resident Cosplay Progressive
Personally I don't think Trump is any more credible than others but I call everyone's credibility into question. Politics and everything surrounding it is all about people pushing their (or the person paying them) agenda. The real question is what is the agenda they're trying to push with what they're doing/saying
As a Trump supporter we dont listen to the MSM talkingbpoints. Sorry.
You mean...you don't listen to anything other than right wing propaganda. As evidenced by your ill-informed postings on these forums. The problem with not believing anything other than what you want to is that your world view becomes increasingly disconnected from reality. And yes, yes, you can go ahead and skip the "NO U" retort.
Googling "Obama obstructing justice" and "Hillary obstructing justice" and linking blogs without even reading them (or you read them and you actually believe the drivvel and conspiracies therein) is not a great way to go about a discussion. If you can't verify that it happened, or there's uncertainty that it's even obstruction of justice, you don't have a case.
On the other hand, asking someone to end an investigation into your own corruption, then firing that person when they don't, is obstruction of justice. I realize you may agree with Trump's actions because you don't want to see your dear leader removed from office, but here in the real world, it's obstruction.
- - - Updated - - -
The 16th amendment disagrees with you. Why do you hate the constitution?
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Yes? And? Contrary to popular belief there is pretty much no one who doesn't recognize that he's president. Don't mistake rhetoric like "no my president" from an actual lack of realizing he's president. They may question the legitimacy of the election, but then again Trump himself has questioned the legitimacy of the election.
I mean really. THAT is your response? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously?
You mean a president that has literally accomplished nothing but millions in tax dollars wasted to his country clubs, millions wasted in defending his wife that wants nothing to do with him that is trying her fucking hardest to stay away from him, and 2 failed travel bans and a healthcare bill that doesn't help anyone but his 1% cronies? Yeah, he will be lucky to make it past his first term to try to run for his 2nd.
In this election, yes. Newspapers endorsing candidates is a longstanding tradition and is a part of their editorial rather than news responsibilities.
The fact that they all backed Clinton over Trump says nothing beyond the fact that the opinion of relatively informed members of the "media elite", as they're so often referred to by conservatives and many of which regularly endorse Republicans or have not failed to endorse a Republican for decades, was that Trump was woefully unqualified to be president.
And based on the events of the past 4 months, it seems like they were pretty spot on.
I'm still waiting for evidence.
They do, but advertising and editorial are two different departments and most proper newspapers have a strict separation between ad and editorial teams. It's commonly referred to as "separation of church and state", and it's there specifically to prevent any possible influence on their editorial team by their advertisers.
So unless you can point out to some instances where this was an issue for any notable/regional newspapers, your'e tilting at windmills, dude.