So should they've done fake news and offer him false positive coverage for political correctness?
So should they've done fake news and offer him false positive coverage for political correctness?
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
his poll numbers are between 35% - 39% with the higher numbers being given to him to the right wing outlets. But unless you are a blind Trump followers he is responsible for his bad coverage, when even fox news and the wall street journal are giving you negative headlines then you know something is wrong.
The Trump administration has been an amateur shitshow from day one. Of course the coverage is overwhelmingly negative.
If you don't want the media to cover your continued fuckups, stop fucking up.
Yup, been proven right again. Please continue to wallow in your hate and deny it. It's really funny, yet sad.
Do you really want me to quote every post you made about baselessly accusing the MSM as being biased? I can, but then again I don't actually have to have proof according to you.
Keep up the hate, sad little boy.
Last edited by Noxx79; 2017-05-28 at 07:56 PM.
Proof: www.cnn.com
Was listening to NPR yesterday, they said the coverage of all presidents has been 60% negative at least except for Obama, Obama was 40% negative for some reason, well for the first 4 months or so then they tore into Obama too. News is mostly negative if you think about it.
Yeah, I think they're a little harder on Trump than past presidents but not all that much.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
Answer is rather easy though.
Obama was mostly controversial free, you may have disagreed with some things but that's realistic.
Both Bushes.....well don't need to mention to much about them since both are unpopular
Clinton....8 years of a witch-hunt by republicans will get you great negative press
Saint Reagen...their was that Iran weapons sale, that didn't really help
Obama' term was kind of relatively calm in comparison, hell wouldn't be surprised if H Clinton got more negative press during Obama's term then Obama himself.