I'd love to see historical data for this poll. I get the feeling that between 18-29 there has always been a decently high rejection of capitalism.
sigh
The polls for brexit were within the margin of error, the stock market and pundits decided to ignore it. The 2016 election polls were also very accurate showing Trump closing in after the Comey release in swing states, just because people decided to interpret the numbers as guarantees does not change what they are. Whenever people say says lol polls it shows their lack of understanding of basic mathematics.
A majority of millennials now reject capitalism, poll shows
"The word 'capitalism' doesn't mean what it used to," said Zach Lustbader, a senior at Harvard involved in conducting the poll, which was published Monday. For those who grew up during the Cold War, capitalism meant freedom from the Soviet Union and other totalitarian regimes. For those who grew up more recently, capitalism has meant a financial crisis from which the global economy still hasn't completely recovered.
Lustbader, 22, said the darkening mood on capitalism is evident in the way politicians talk about the economy. When Republicans — long the champions of free enterprise — use the word "capitalism" these days, it's often to complain about "crony capitalism," he said.
"You don't hear people on the right defending their economic policies using that word anymore," Lustbader added.
It is an open question whether young people's attitudes on socialism and capitalism show that they are rejecting free markets as a matter of principle or whether those views are simply an expression of broader frustrations with an economy in which household incomes have been declining for 15 years.
No. I'm saying we've seen this movie before. We know exactly how it ends.
What you think millenials are the first twentysomething generation to dabble with socialism?
But sure "this time it's different". You know what happens after 30? You gain responsibilities. You have kids. They start to need things. You start to want things. For yourself and for them.
And suddenly highly philosophical discussions about socialism look rather quaint.
You want to know what the destroyer of your socialist dreams are? People having sex with each other and making babies. Babies who need things. It's the same story as always.
But hey, I'm down with remakes.
- - - Updated - - -
And more than that... how many of those exact same people won't be in the next 5-10 years... and suddenly have a change of opinion.
It's really easy to not care for capitalism when you're living on somebody elses dime. And that includes student loans.
I think in that age range you're looking at what you'd expect to see. 18-29 would have a much larger portion of folks who are living at home and/or are under/unemployed. Little-no responsibility, little-no real world experience.
And I'm in that age range saying that.
...and when they have kids maybe they'll be glad of that social safety net...
Societies are always changing methods and practices, and then giving them categorical labels.
Usually within a society such as American, or Roman 1,500 years ago, the society doesn't fit the label 100%.
While most of American practices, policies, and standard ways of operating are "capitalistic", we're not really living in the 1950's anymore.
Also, usually when a society or civilization progresses one way or the other, the subsequent progressions become more frequent.
Almost like Moore's Law and Computing, in the sense that there probably is some socio-psychological "law" that explains that.
But I'm not so well versed in the technicalities.
<~$~("The truth, is limitless in its range. If you drop a 'T' and look at it in reverse, it could hurt.")~$~> L.F.
<~$~("The most hopelessly stupid man is he who is not aware he is wise.")~$~> I.A.
And of course people would attribute it widely to things not related to rampant corruption.
Oh and one more thing. Go take a time machine back to Nancy Pelosi circa 1997. It's easy to be hard left when you don't have responsibilities or power.
Nancy Pelosi 2017 is what responsibility and power does. Nancy Pelosi is what happens to nearly every left leaning political figure, for good reason.
I mean, I agree, capitalism is morally wrong, but I don't think the people in charge will allow it to change.
You do know that in most places around the world, that are indeed NOT capitalists, share a common house-hold for a majority of family members, regardless of age?
Your way of thinking is more "capitalist" than anything, to think that each person or (couple), no matter what at the age of 18+. Should have their own, basically "everything" it is to be a True house-hold. That is; Car, House, Wardrobe, Means of sustainable support, etc. Is not only 1, wasteful, but also astronomically expensive as a whole, economically.
<~$~("The truth, is limitless in its range. If you drop a 'T' and look at it in reverse, it could hurt.")~$~> L.F.
<~$~("The most hopelessly stupid man is he who is not aware he is wise.")~$~> I.A.