Who said anything about winning them over? Donald Trump is at some level, an ongoing test of individual Americans principles. If Americans have to be cajoled or "won over" to do what should be right and obvious in the most basic sense, then the problem is right their visible to us: the democratic (small d) and good governance cred of many Americans is rather flimsy, to say the least.
I'll say again... put aside Trump-Russia. Why is Jared Kuschner and Ivanka Trump working from the West wing? How is that acceptable? How is it acceptable Trump didn't release his tax returns? How is it acceptable he doesn't free himself of all his conflicts of interest? How is it acceptable he threatens people on twitter, or from the podium? How is it acceptable he says things that patently are not true (e.g 'money is pouring in to NATO, like it's some kind of bank account).
In a world where Trump-Russia never was a thing, these discrete things which have happened SINCE election day would destroy Trump's legitimacy as President, because the standards that Presidents of the United States should be held to should be high ones. A+ ones. Not C- or D+ ones.
Life experience makes people view things like that. I'm a person of high standards. I hold others to high standards. But then again I suppose it's not surprising hunting camo wearing deplorables don't think like that.
Of course they would. Those who paint them as fake or whatever news are a minority.
There's a big misconception going on..
Fox News is the leading CABLE news network. Not The leading news outlet as such though.
Not even on TV is Fox News the most watched news, as far as I know that's either ABC News or NBC News. One of the two.
The nationally and internationally highest regarded journalists do not work for Fox N.
Fox News is by its very nature a biased outlet. It was created as such, to give the Republican party an outlet.
That by itself is what's comical. All the attacks on the likes of the NYT, or even CNN (which is the number 1 news network in the world), and yet the same people screaming bias love Fox and think it's unbiased news because they don't know why it even exists.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
If I was Trump, and CNN and the NYT was printing all this fake news on me after worshiping Obama for eight years, I would give them no access at all until they both ran a story for a week detailing all the fake news stories they'd written, and a comparison of their bias toward Obama and against me.
A party or political movement without ethical standards (and high standards in general) has legitimately zero points.
It ceases to be a political movement and becomes a mob.
- - - Updated - - -
Uh-huh.
Mueller is still going to take your President from you.
CNN and New York Times got busted for printing fake news on live TV during Comey's testimony and they still have yet to print a retraction or apology. They should be happy they are still allowed in at press conferences at all.
Honestly,
People voted Trump because of the bold part. You can't go a single post without tearing someone down. The answer to most of your points above? He doesn't have to be concerned with the demands of the media. If he was breaking the law, the Democrats would have started the impeachment process yesterday. The fact that they have nothing to move on despite 24/7 negative coverage should be telling.
I don't wear camo, I'm not a country bloke, and I'm decently educated (B.S. working in management), and I like what he's doing for me, my paycheck, and to shut down the garbage that you're spewing that is equally, if not more toxic than anything that he's said in the past.
That was just Alexa. Othe reasearch broadly corresponds to that data:
http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/news-websites
Yes but I can tell you right now, most of the so called conservatives on here, are at best what many would call neo-conservatives and steer pretty far from such values.
There is so many camps now within "conservatism" that it's really hard to define what being a "conservative" truthfully means anymore. Similar issue with liberals. If we were to go by the "classical" sense of what a liberal was, there is so few today who actually embody that and I can tell you most if not all of them are no longer on or ever were part of what constitutes as the "left" as it is currently.
So this is why I'm baffled when anyone uses the term "real" as if it is truly a defining thing, you know?
i'll explain myself because I hold you in tremendous regard.
1. I don't necessarily like Trump, I find him uncouth, disrespectful, and ill tempered. However, I try to show a moderate respect for the office and the position, so I try to evaluate things he is doing by policy instead of by personality. For example, Nixon might have acted like an ass, but he was also a tremendously effective president.
Some of the things he does I agree with and others I don't.
2. CNN, NYT.....goes out of there way to publish bullshit stories about him that show a obvious, huge, bias against him. For example, CNN really reported, and complained, about trump having 2 scoops of ice cream instead of 1 like everyone else.
Who gives a shit.
The press, from all angles, haven't remained objective. Additionally, given the evidence that CNN attempted to assist the Hillary campaign during the election, they are lucky to have a seat at the press table at all.
I love my country, but the levels of tribalism have gotten out of control, I don't see it getting better anytime soon either. If this forum is any indication of how we are getting along in this country, as a whole, we are truly fucked.
Dont get it twisted. Their may be a handful of differences but theirs very little day light between trump and so called genuine conservatives. In point of fact so called genuine conservatives will be happy to ride trumps ass for tax cuts for the wealthy and spending cuts for the rest while claiming he aint a conservative!! Nah sorry no day light. The man who eats meat is brother to the butcher. Conservatives own trump.