Precisely. If you shoot once, you could have hit a spot where you haven't neutralized the target. You are taught to shoot multiple times. If the person is moving, or running, you don't know which shot will neutralize.
You don't fuck with someone brandishing a knife at you. Cops aren't MMA fighters or Navy Seals, for fucks sake. It's also irrational to think we can train every single officer, whether you are a 4'8 woman or a 6'3 man, or if you are 18 or 64, to be able to physically fight people and disarm them of non-firearm weapons.
What if the cops were women? Would it be suddenly okay to have taken life because suddenly the officers are physically incapable of tackling the victim? Does that mean that we should only accept 6'3 men in the police force so they can out-muscle a majority of the population? Should we wait until officers get killed by blunt weapons and knives before we tell them to shoot?
Seriously, what do people want them to do? Dodge her knife swings like Mayweather dodges punches? Go on liveleak and watch knife fights. If you tried to take on someone with a knife armed with nothing but a taser, you will get stabbed or cut, and it's not an acceptable risk we can ask anyone - including police officers - to take.
The officers clearly told her to move back. She did not. The proper action was taken and while I lament the loss of life, the officers took the correct action and shot until the thread was neutralized. They then attempted to keep her alive and performed CPR until the ambulance came.
Tasers can work, but it is a one shot deal. Not to mention they can be obstructed by clothing (and thus not even work) or if the person is high on certain drugs it can even make them immune to it.
Can't run? It isn't hard to cover distance, especially if you are stressed or angry.
Don't police in america have batons like in normal countries, could of hit the woman on the arm and made her drop the knife...
I'm sure that they'll find nothing wrong occurred when they review themselves.
Let's play out the scenario. You arrive to the apartment where a crazed woman wielding a knife is frantic. You tell her to drop the knife. She refuses. Do you shoot her now? No because she is not a threat. She keeps refusing to drop the knife. Do risk disarming her or keep telling her to drop the knife while pointing a gun at her? The safer bet for you would be option two. She then comes at you (I'm not saying this happened, just moving the scenario along). Where do you shoot? We already know she's a skinny woman that's moving at you so shooting at her arms or legs would be incredibly difficult since they are moving. Shooting at the center of her chest would give you the best chance of hitting something and most of your vital organs are stored there. Any shot you miss is one less bullet that hits your target. You don't know how many bullets it will take to stop someone so you need everyone to hit. That is also why you empty your clip into your target.
I only hope that anyone in here saying the officer did right, CAn have one of their family members shot in this manner.
How much you want to bet they would change their mind on police use of force..
Have you ever noticed women are disproportionately avoided (or men are disproportionately shot more)? In fact the gender disparity is much much greater than the race disparity. Yet you wouldn't really get up in arms about that, and it kind of throws a wrench into your opinion on this case.