yes how dare they imply that refugees are actual humans
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
You're reading into something that isn't there. I wish I could talk to you with my voice and let you see my face, and you'd see how completely flat my expression is and how calm my voice would be. So please, don't project emotions onto me which I'm not showing or expressing. Simply disagreeing with you doesn't make me upset. But this is how it's used when someone says that, because it's never meant to be logical or reasonable. It's just a "NU-UH! YOU ARE!" kind of response.
Last edited by Noomz; 2017-06-21 at 12:51 AM.
ha, look at the dislikes.
i think we should accept some of the syrians. that's the only refugees i'm ok with accepting.
and even those should be split well apart from each other once they're here. don't let them be insular and form their own communities. they must integrate, or they should have to leave.
Do you think this video is without motivation when there's clearly people like the OP who find the notion of humanizing refugees to be this offensive? You can't be this naive. You know better if you've ever followed any kind of forum or media, that immigration is the hottest issue today.
Projecting much? I'm upset because people do not understand economics, and how we could help people in Syria, since it would be cheaper and more effective (old/disabled people are still there they suffer and no one cares since able bodied men came here and everyone loves them).
"Making" them integrate will not work, and it would be imo a harassment. Much better and easier way to help them would be to send money or even go there as volunteer. We could help people that really need help since most of them are not able to go anywhere.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
It actually wouldn't be 'cheaper and more effective', by virtue of the fact that you would have to build infrastructure in Syria from scratch versus using the existing systems and simply scaling them up to meet demand. There's also a tricky neo-imperialist argument surrounding nation building these days.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I've asked you to show me the economical problem, in case you missed it. You'll need to support your statement about this being an economical problem, ontop of supporting your statement that foreign aid or whatever other means you've yet to clarify to me could cost. And let's have it be verifiable sources, preferably multiple ones.
I hope I'm not coming across as sarcastic or snarky. I'm sincere with this.
I think most liberals wouldn't consider this propaganda in he same way scientologists wouldn't consider their shit propaganda either lol.