this is just perfect example why discussion with such people is pointless .
they will nevr understand basics of economics and fact that whether they like it or not they have no other choice but to work closely with european markets.
those are people who still dream great dreams about how once upon a time their commonwealth meant something in world only forgot to notice world changed.
not only you will have to obide to all those regulations you hate but also you will have no say in creating further ones.
this is why plebs should not have vote for important matters.
First, though I'm not from the UK, I think calling it a rotten carcass is just absurd hyperbole and totally untrue when held in comparison to the majority of the world. Just like almost every country, it has some great things about it and some crap things.
Second, you cannot simply "migrate elsewhere." I dislike the current US administration, though honestly wasn't all that pleased with the last one either. However, even if I considered parts of the EU, Canada, or Australia a better fit for me, it is not possible for me to simply decide to "migrate elsewhere." Beyond the realities of forcing people to leave families behind who can't or won't migrate, no country just has open borders like that.
Third, roughly 50/50 (according to the BBC numbers) is actually very close to a 1.25 million people (my "shy of 2 mill" was an estimate that was obviously off by a bit). Regardless, 1.25 MILLION people don't change by altering the minds of 1 or 2 farmers.
You can say democracy is the rule of the whole, but that simply isn't true. Democracy is, as has been said by many historians and political philosophers from France, England, and many other places, the tyranny of the majority. It is NOT the will of the whole by any stretch.
Even if I were to give you this (which I still don't really agree with), then saying that individuals who voted AGAINST Brexit have responsibility for Brexit is roughly 150 times less accurate than saying "Your hamburger is made of rat droppings," as that ratio caps (in the US) at 1 in 450,000 mg. Saying they even have SOME responsibility (again, just giving your position validity for the sake of argument) is 150 times more absurd than saying "Your hamburger has some rat droppings" when someone asks "what's in hamburger?" Even if I were to give you technical accuracy, the implication that it is a measurably relevant amount is absurd. You also don't account for the people who DID change 1 or 2 minds - much less dozens. What about those people? Are they given a pass in your judgmental world?
Who, other than you, said that a guiding principle of democracy is "we are all responsible for every decision our peers make?" I'm sorry, but that's absurd. You seem to view the world in two very distinct pieces without allowing for any reality in the middle. There are plenty of people who pushed against Trump in the US, for example, and CONTINUE to do so after his election. They are in no way complicit and in no way are they saying "Got mine, screw you" or "too bad everyone, almost half of us chose wrong, oh well." Elections like Brexit, as you point out, are NOT one time events to be taken out of context. Every vote, every decision, then lends the question, "where do we go from here?" What next? Sure, if people just vote, go home, and never take anything from the result, sure... I can see SOME argument for those people being complicit in the result. But reasonable people do what they can when they can. They deal with REALITY. They continue to see how, in this new reality, they can make the best of things. How they can try and limit the damage done by those people who had the majority. How they can make improvements. I'm sorry, but I don't see how you can lump people actively working against something as being responsible for it.
Man who only cares about money moans he might lose money
"I am a liberurl, but.."
Soros is one of the few billionaires that publically support western democracies, and that support the fight against fascism. He has some city programs running in germany, where he is doing political education, in special against political fanatism.
You mix up Soros with some enemy that doesnt exist.