check out a company called Answer One. they are an answering service for several businesses here in Arizona (assuming you are in the phoenix area).
they start out in the $13-$14 an hour range. have a lot of different shifts and good benefits. My grand daughter has been there almost a year and is now making over $15/hr.
Imagine if life really was fair, and all the bad things that happen to you happen because you deserved them.
IF you can't provide for your employees you shouldn't have business.
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycloped...-michigan.html
You cannot get unemployment if you quit your job due to lowered hours/wages. The best you can do is apply for underemployment to help make up the difference.Reasons for Unemployment
You must be out of work through no fault of your own to qualify for unemployment benefits in Michigan.
Layoffs. If you were laid off, lost your job in a reduction-in-force (RIF), or got "downsized" for economic reasons, you will meet this requirement.
Quitting. You won't be eligible for unemployment benefits if you quit your job voluntarily, without good cause. In general, good cause means that you had a compelling work-related reason that left you no other choice than to leave. For example, if you left your job because of dangerous working conditions or discrimination that your employer refused to stop, you may be able to collect benefits. You may also remain eligible if you quit because your job was harmful to your mental or physical health, but only if you get a note from a medical professional to that effect and you tried unsuccessfully to secure alternative work with your employer or go on leave. Certain compelling personal reasons will also not disqualify you. For example, if you quit your job to relocate with a spouse who had to move for a new military assignment, you will still be eligible for benefits.
Firing. If you were fired because you lacked the skills to perform the job or simply weren't a good fit, you won’t necessarily be barred from receiving benefits. If, however, you were fired for misconduct relating to the job, you may be disqualified from receiving benefits. For example, you will likely be ineligible for benefits if you were fired for failing a drug test, being intoxicated at work, assaulting someone, stealing property, or failing to show up for work for three days in a row without notifying your employer.
Last edited by Orange Joe; 2017-06-22 at 01:51 PM.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
All this "advice" is going to wind up getting the OP a pink slip after finally finding a job that pays well.
I am salaried and easily work over 50+ hours a week, with some of those days skipping lunch due to conference calls. It's just how work in the US works sometimes.
I would ask if they would be willing to give you 15 minutes to collect yourself, but calling up all sorts of government agencies will get your ass canned in a right to work state. Plus you will have no legal recourse. If you are late to work multiple times, where they might of turned the other way before, are now collecting paper work on you to make sure when they do give you your pink slip there are no repercussions.
Tread lightly if you really enjoy this job and the pay.
As someone who quit after hours and pay were cut, by my company sending work oversea's just recently in Michigan, I assure you that I am not incorrect. Again, Causation - or Cause. I've since gotten new employment, and am now collecting underemployment from UIA, but that was after I filed adjustment of work.
UIA filed the cause as reduction in pay as cause, and allowed benefits to be collected. YMMV.
There is a difference between skipping lunch because of your own scheduling issues (taking a conference call) vs skipping lunch because you are literally expected to be present at your workspace the entire 8 hours of your shift and (presumably) have no opportunity to eat even if you order takeout.
All of this comes from the idea that if you don't regulate companies, they will grow bigger and invest more, making everyone richer. Which is funny because the experience from Europe and other high income regions has shown that you can have huge growth and good quality of life while keeping the regulations.
So, this is a failed idea. It doesn't work. But the US is a huge country which is very politically divided, and such ideas are core ideology for quite a lot of people. So it's very hard, if not impossible, for these ideas to disappear, even if they are wrong.
No, this advice will motivate OP to find better jobs that treat it's employees more reasonably.
In which fucked up world giving a lunch break to employees is considered a shameful and unreasonable thing to do? Some replies here genuinely make me drop my jaw.
I used to visit Chinese electronics assembly factories and even those guys there get 1 full hour of lunch break and rest and it's even paid (even if salary is a joke, the point is that hour is included in the pay).
And US does not do that? Really? Wow...
You can bet in my country if employer would deny lunch breaks, he'd be sued into oblivion in a blink of an eye and somehow businesses here don't go bankrupt over this.
Last thing: having proper lunch at proper time and with enough time to actually enjoy it and recover is a health thing - not having this is not worth the pittance you are paid - you will end up spending that money on doctors and medicine in the long run like that.