Yes, and not all conservatives believe that guns rights should be unabridged. That doesn't legitimize your argument that it's not a conservative value. The issue isn't what you value, but what conservatives value. You are an individual, while a group is defined by majority opinion. A reply of 'I'm conservative, so it's not true that it's a conservative value' is considerably different than 'I'm conservative and don't agree with this value.
As ironic as it may seem, you are expressing the angst of being a minority.
I'm not having difficulty understanding, it's why I don't need to question if you know what you are talking about. I get your perspective, just because you don't get mine, doesn't mean I'm not well versed.
How exactly was communism, even in Stalin's form, a bigger government than the czar? You need to be specific here, because that is wholly untrue.
The French monarchy controlled every facet of French life. It wasn't just because they were wealthy, it's was because the populace had nothing. You are making a terrifying point, if you are suggesting that the issue was just wealth and not the power it had over the people.
Absurd... there is no possible way this is the case. How exactly is rising against monarchy, not even remotely the same? How about remotely similar, instead of absolutes like the same? (Remotely the same, is also an oxymoron.)
A government by an individual, for the individual, of the individual. Is a monarchy...
- - - Updated - - -
It's the usual thing that has been reinforced by Trump. You are not to trust opposing point of views. You watch the same rhetoric and then when confronted with disagreement, you don't actually understand the point you are making. Because you don't build the necessary perspective of the opposition in an echo chamber, you don't know how to defend it from critics.