Good on the EU for holding up consumer rights and values.
Good on the EU for holding up consumer rights and values.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
Which does more harm than good, because of this we have to acomodate idiotic laws passed in EU. Also a fix, we haven't been a part of soviet Union, like Ukraine for instance. We've moved from under the soviet oriented socialist and we fell under brussels oriented socialists.
Last edited by Nehezbegar; 2017-06-27 at 04:05 PM.
EU easily has the most pro-consumer legislation in the world when it comes to...almost everything. From food safety standards to workers rights and general anti-consumer business practices
To go against it, is to go against yourself. Which is ridiculous.
The world should strive to have legislation like the EU.
Last edited by Radaney; 2017-06-27 at 04:08 PM.
I don't get any ads and I searched the same thing that they searched.
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
"Stuck"? You are delusional. You really think that the money google's competitors would get by taking charge over a population of 700million would make no difference?
I suppose I should know better due to your posting history but to sincerely think that another company wouldn't surge in to snap up that market is fucking laughable.
Speciation Is Gradual
How is this any different then pre-internet where companies would send you flyers with "sale" prices on them but if you took the time and drove or called all the competitors you may find a cheaper price. There are also many price lookup tools available(camelcamelcamel, shopbot to name a few). But hey it is the EU again not liking smart business practices.
- - - Updated - - -
The void would be filled but currently the other options are subpar compared to the search algorithms that google employs. There is a reason why google has made most other search engines obsolete. The other backlash you would have is from Corporate EU where they have built website to include google search functions of the internal website. They would be force to do a mass update.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
Never going to happen since they need this market badly if they were to leave it they would create such an open space for competition to take over and something would take over that spot without a doubt, google became great due to numerous users and their feedback they didn't just became good over night.
- - - Updated - - -
Especially the amount of stupidity from Polish legislators.
This to show how far back your political majority is living in time, truly never gets old.
Than again a person being for populism politics calling others inferior is a good way to make a fool out of yourself
Of course it would take a bit of time for the other companies to fully catch up, but he's acting like it'd be the end of the world for Europe's technology sector if we lost google which simply isn't the case at all. Look at how quickly technology changes, you only have to look at how many search engines have been and gone simply because they DIDN'T have a market share with which to get the money needed for development.
There are countless options NOW for the nonsense 'stuff we'd miss' that he spouted, with a little extra publicity there is no reason why they wouldn't take up the mantle from a company that would no longer exist to be an opponent.
They are like bacteria, google is the big boy at the moment, but when they get sprayed that 0.1% of bacteria that survives WILL take over.
Speciation Is Gradual
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
Of course Hubcap (and few similar US nationalist geniuses) is whining in this thread about how evul EU is deliberately targeting poor, innocent US companies on the basis of them being US companies. Not because, I dunno, them breaking the law of the countries they operate in (in terms of Google, that case was going on for years so they had ample time to adhere to EU's antitrust laws). To make the argument even more laughable, included Uber as an example, despite their business model resting on deliberately breaking the law. Nationalists with victimhood issues, predictable as always.