What kind of mental gymnastics do CNN apologists have to do to combat a producer on tape saying these things? Sure you can attack the source but unless O'Keefe has some next level CGI, this dude is saying some damning shit. The only scenario you can possibly try to prove is that it's an actor and not the real guy because the whole "out of context" narrative is dead on arrival.
That awkward moment when Buzzfeed turns out to be more credible source of news than CNN.
I hope all those great houses of journalism keep up citing those anonymous sources, I'm sure nobody else could possibly be forced to resign over something as such ...
So some people tried to lie and CNN fired them? How is that fake news?
Resident Cosplay Progressive
Oh god, I guess enough time has passed for Project Veritas so rear it's malformed head again for all the retards to take seriously. Until another news network or source comes up with something similar have fun trying to convince me of anything over the laughter.
Keep defending a known liar. Just because you are incapable of understanding editing, doesn't mean that it didn't happen.
Here's something - He says the "russia narrative"
What is that exactly? Did he say exactly what was BS, or just the narrative? Because the "narrative" can literally mean anything.
I'll disprove the video, when you either disprove that Trump has a Putin body pillow, and colluded to win the election OR you realize how dishonest and stupid it is to ask to disprove a negative.
The onus is on you to prove the video right, and given the track record of Veritas, I wish you luck. They're on par with pizza pedophiles as far as credibility
Disprove a negative? What? Did O'Keefe splice words together to form a sentence? Please explain why a CNN producer is saying these things. Simple question.
- - - Updated - - -
For somebody to say something is fake, the burden of proof falls upon that person to prove why. Welcome to debate 101.