Things like this have always been around. Mainstream media is just happening to give them undue notice at this point.
Beyond that they have no appropriate ways to protest and not be a complete nuisance to the world around them.
Antifa is fighting an imaginary enemy, and the only way they can fight back is by causing massive public chaos and threaten other people to somehow see their point. But this only further secures my view that they are a domestic terrorist group with no reasonable clause behind them.
To be fair, he's quite right in his assessment that a discussion about whether 'true' communism has ever been achieved or not, is utterly redundant and superfluous, since that 'version' of it literally can not be achieved in large scale reality. What we've already seen in so called communist countries, many times over, is MUCH closer to the practical outcome of any attempt than a theoretical utopia would ever be, whatever corrupted traits said states exhibited in terms of socialist ideology, etc etc. The notion of a communist utopia is very similar to the threads where random forum posters snap up a possible breakthrough in telomer-research, and start predicting that we'll reach a few hundred years of age in our lifetime - kids trying to be visionary, without having any practical understanding, neither about all factors involved nor about the overall picture, but rich in imagination and a will to believe. In both cases, who knows what will happen several hundred years from now, but we can all rest assured that whatever significant progress might be made some day, in either case, it is literally impossible that we will be around to see it. It will never become anything other than theoretical and philosophical, not for any of us.
Ironically, I was an anarchist in high school and early college. I eventually learned that 1, from such a state, any form of new government(s) could sprout up, and they may or may not be as bad or worse than current. 2, if there was no unified military to support such a state, a foreign body could easily invade and likely win, and if anarchy is global, then you will instead have groups, such as tribes or... religious zealots, for example, who will reign in control in the same fashion as ancient history.
Basically, I realized that for an anarchist society or globe to function, humans would need to stop being fucked up, and that is not going to happen. At the same time, I have anarchist sympathies still, because as my post illustrated... man, fuck those assholes in power and their rich masters. The G20 protests? A direct response to the bullshit happening.
People are bored and have the 'luxury' to not have to do productive shit, so they crave attention.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Look at the fuckstains in just about any government, it's relatively easy to at least see the allure of pissing on all of it and backing anarchy.
We haven't seen it work though, in practice. And that's kind of important.
There is no discussing of capitalism "on its own terms". You HAVE to compare it to an alternative, otherwise, what's the point? You think capitalism is bad, so what do YOU suggest is better?
- - - Updated - - -
There is a theory and there is a practical application. And yes, I have read the theories behind capitalism/communism. And it's really nice to have these mindclouds where you discuss theoretical constructs.
But at the end of the day, any theory should always help make decisions in real-life. And looking at the practice where both are applied, there are clear advantages of capitalism (as it matches the natural tendencies of human beings) and any time that "communism" has been tried, it devolved into a socialism-like farce of itself.
Personally, I'm a big fan of Marx, but I do agree with his thinking of "Communism is superior to Capitalism when the problem of scarce resources does not exist any more"
https://ageofshitlords.com/list-of-a...genders-so-far
Xenogender– A nonbinary gender identity that cannot be contained by human understandings of gender; more concerned with crafting other methods of gender categorization and hierarchy such as those relating to animals, plants, or other creatures/things. It’s mainly an umbrella term for genders with themes such as nouns, archetypes, synesthetic experiences, neurodivergences.
I believe it to be dangerous to start categorizing political stands with funny names.
I am a authoritarian progressive liberal, so I really have no idea why Anarchist movement pops up, I mean I can understand their protest, but I am not at all in agreement with their methods and why.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
There was never a communist state. Neither the UDSSR nor the eastblock or Kuba. China still isn't communism. Communism is a political construct south of utopia. But seeing as i live in a socialist state and our living standard is a lot higher then say in the united states it seems that pure capitalism isn't that great. So the benefits in a pure system should be standing up for debate.
Also antifa are not all anarchists, not really. Some of them like to paint that on their banners but in truth they don't really care about anarchism or understand that there is a need for a government. most of them are just left leaning students. Which is already in the name.