Rumor going around that he was offended by the woman coming up in her pajamas. Apparently he has a past history of encounters with woman.
Last edited by Quibble; 2017-07-18 at 03:47 PM.
"Everything always changes. The best plan lasts until the first arrow leaves the bow." - Matrim Cauthon
I know this isn't something that you will likely accept.. But wikipedia is almost always the top result, use its references. If that wasn't good enough for you, other than the "data.worldbank" result, UNODC is literally the top result.. Even data.worldbank is just another website using the data from UNODC.
UNODC is also literally the reference to every single news article I could find on the subject.
- - - Updated - - -
The study places dependent territories such as Greenland as it's own "country", rather than being a part of Denmark. Which imo is the right thing to do.
Last edited by Quibble; 2017-07-18 at 03:49 PM.
"Everything always changes. The best plan lasts until the first arrow leaves the bow." - Matrim Cauthon
so... we have a Black police officer killing an unarmed White woman.
Will there be riots over this?
Why would that not be something I would likely accept? Ok, since we're doing that, here is something you likely won't accept: Google results are not universal for everyone. For me, the UNODC study is literally the fourth result, which means it is literally not the top result. However I understand that there is some variation, so I normally wouldn't find not having search results in the same order as a reason to toss soft insults at people, even though from my point of view you would come across as a liar if I didn't understand that.
Neither Wikipedia nor World Bank are organized by rank; Wikipedia has nations grouped by region and their numerical standing on the chart has nothing to do with rank, World Bank simply lists countries alphabetically, at least as deeply as I have looked into this in the past (which was nothing past cursory research for my own curiosity) and my quick check today when I thought the number seemed off from what I was remembering.
I was not prepared with a thesis paper using the correct source. I am sorry you will not accept that.
American cops terrify me. Bunch of community college rejects on a power trip toting weapons that kill with the pull of a trigger, whose lack of discretion rarely has consequences. The last people I want helping me out.
Last edited by BananaHandsB; 2017-07-18 at 04:07 PM.
....
What excatly was your search phrase? And what source did you find? Because I've been unable to find anyone not referencing UNODC.
Well you didn't just google it yourself. And as I said, wikipedia is pretty much always to top result? Atleast it is for me, maybe that is because I'm studying and I use it to find references quite often.
Either way, I've heard it countless times on forums "omg, you can't use wikipedia", "Everyone can edit it, so you can't trust it".
Last edited by Quibble; 2017-07-18 at 04:20 PM.
"Everything always changes. The best plan lasts until the first arrow leaves the bow." - Matrim Cauthon
What is the usual training time for cops in USA? Especially until they are given gun?
Whoops, missed that. Like I said, I didn't invest a lot of time looking into this, which is why I was simply trying to ask the source as it was different from other sources I had seen in my cursory look at the subject. So thanks for providing with the answer with no editorial comment.
For today it was simply 'international homicide rate'. And I didn't check every single source on page 1 so I can't speak to their references. Again, as I said I did a cursory overview to refresh my memory from a previous look and was simply trying to ask a source as it was different from what I was remembering having seen. I didn't invest the time in digging through sources in all the references I looked at. I was assuming since they had a source they would be able to easily provide it to me for me to look into later. But thanks for providing the source instead and providing the information with no editorial comment whatsoever.What excatly was your search phrase?
Because, no matter what phrase I used.. Every single result on page 1, all reference UNODC.
I did though, and Wikipedia was the top result. And again, I missed the rate because I was just scrolling through trying to refresh my memory, then I moved on to the next result and did a quick check there, and so on. The UNODC pulled up the whole study and I didn't want to wade through it, so I was simply trying to ask so I could pursue it more later. And again, thank you for simply providing the answer with no editorial comment.Well you didn't just google it yourself. And as I said, wikipedia is pretty much always to top result? Atleast it is for me, maybe that is because I'm studying and I use it to find references quite often.
Basically though the homicide designation just indicates that the person died due to an injury caused by another human. That is not a criminal charge yet just a finding that the gunshot wound was the cause of death. It is interesting we have not even heard yet what the police officers reasoning behind the shooting was yet it seems like shooting past your partner inside a car would be something you would not want to do unless there was some serious threat or your partner was being directly attacked.