there will be no riots over this one
why do you suppose that is?
there will be no riots over this one
why do you suppose that is?
https://www.hotslogs.com/Player/Prof...ayerID=1579599
"MMOC forums let me keep my job again. Whew." -Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street
When will people learn!?
A badge and/or gun does not make a bad person some-how a "good-person".
<~$~("The truth, is limitless in its range. If you drop a 'T' and look at it in reverse, it could hurt.")~$~> L.F.
<~$~("The most hopelessly stupid man is he who is not aware he is wise.")~$~> I.A.
I wonder how many people defending the police would like to be tied to a chair and then tasered repeatedly because their bodies involuntarily twitched while being electrocuted?
I know there are masochists out there, but I didn't really realize there were this many.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
"Stop resisting."
You fucking pillock, the human body spasms when tasered.
Was that person me? No? Then why are you holding me responsible?
I didn't "auto-assume" anything. Neither did I claim there was no reason.
I did claim theere was no justification for torturing a restrained suspect.
You are thinking up something unrelated.
the suspect was restrained. In a chair. If three men who are supposed to have training for this cannot deal with one bound suspect without losing their head and resorting to torture then it doesn't matter what "reasons" they have. They do not have justification.
Yes, we do not know everything, but from what we know we can already tell that there was a problem on the side of the officers. Maybe it wasn't their fault, maybe the ones responsible for their training and equipment should get the blame, but this certainly isn't how you deal with your charges in a civilized country. If they had no other option then that only means that they weren't qualified to hold him. There is never justification for torture. A reason maybe, but not justification.
- - - Updated - - -
A teen is a kid.
So you think torturing a restrained individual into compliance is justified and should be up to the personal judgement of police officers?
- - - Updated - - -
Just because you close your eyes and put your hands ove your ears does not make the facts go away, no matter how strongly you imagine them gone.
the cops did nothing wrong , its obvious they were not trained properly. The kid probably did something to deserve it though.
Its stated in the article that the officers paper work shows he was tased for resisting proior to and while they were trying to transport him so thats very verified
18/19 is NOT a kid get real take a look at his booking photo hes a big guy also its not torture at all when you are trying to move someone from point a to b and they are resisting get that through you head.
@Firatha it is no use talking to Noradin, he made up his mind and cannot be swayed. He came into this thread hot and hostile from the start.
A teen is still a kid, no matter their size.
Using pain to make a restrained person compliant is torture.
How much he resisted and how justified tasering him while he was unrestrained is irrelevant, it is not up to the officers to make a judgement.
And anyway, what is stated in the officers paper work might be the truth, it might be them trying to cover up abuse, that is up to the courts.
- - - Updated - - -
You were the one coming in here mind made up that the suspect "had it coming" because he "must have done something off-screen" that "justifies" torture.
And what we see in that video is torture. He is restained, he cannot do anything but involutarily twitch when shocked. Did you even watch the evidence before coming to your conclusion that the officers "must have been justified somehow because obviously the teen must have done something"?
- - - Updated - - -
That is what they claim, but it is irrelevant.
They are police officers, not judges.
he was restrained in the video where he was shocked repeatedly and that is what this thread is about, not his behaviour while he was unrestrained.
@Noradin this is last time I will address you in this matter; Your bias is very clear, that you are clearly one sided with blinders on. No matter what anyone says, you will either ignore it or waive it off because it doesn't fit your narrative. You obviously have issues with cops, and do not know how things work with violent criminals who are resisting. Being restrained does not suddenly make you compliant, you can still be violent, combative, and resistant while in restraints.
if he was already restrained to a chair... let him tire himself out. why continue to tase him... which by the way can kill? Just seems needless.
Typical of Americans and their handling of mental health issues.
What the article doesn't mention is those cops doped him up with lsd before they then applied the electroshock therapy.
Just like the cia did to unruly children in the 1950s.
Nothing to see here please move along.
What was the timeframe of this? Because if it was all during the arrest, how is he alive after 40 successful tasings? Even with low amperage repeated pulses of high voltage can cause major damage.