And I was pointing out that them calling "being emotional for others" emotional labor is not a thing.
I understand the concept fine. But I, like most people, refuse to accept made-believe rhetoric as a valid, rational argument. It's the equivalent of a bible-thumper using a story from the Bible as an argument.
Something having a modern definition doesn't make it any less rhetorical or stupid. This isn't a debate. If you use "micro-aggression" unironically, you're an idiot. /shrug
Since we're linking definitions, here's one that's equally stupid and yet describes "micro-aggression" aptly:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de...n/gobbledygook
Haven't you been paying attention? Only "oppressed" people are "victims". I should probably just ignore him, but I find humor in other people's stupid.
I pick and choose what words or points makes a person's argument inane and irrelevant, like most rational people.
Last edited by Mistame; 2017-08-06 at 07:13 PM.