Originally Posted by
Dmitro
TBH, I am all for Government forcing monopoly sites like google and youtube to not censor/ban/hide stuff. How is it against the freedom of speech I dont get tho (;
Imagine a situation.
there is just 1 major private subway corporation in US and it says " we wont serve black people because this and that" ( doesnt matter whether its legal or not, imagine for a second that it is)
Whats your take on that
- - - Updated - - -
"And if you think noone is catering to your agenda anymore, you still have the chance to make a blog to talk about your political views."
Nobody needs to cater to my agenda lol ( I dont have one on top of that) , I just want major and almost monopolitical giants to remain objective and not benefit one social/political agenda over the other. Is it too much to ask for?
"And why should you bother about facebook banning "hate speech"? You dont sound like someone who has to utilize hate speech."
I just dont like censorship of any forms and kinds. My bad I guess.
- - - Updated - - -
There was never a pro-hate speech algorithm, they were just showing the most popular ones ( which is normal), now on the contrary the more popular will be on 2nd or 3rd pages because they are hate speech or something. Is it pro free speech or anti, whats your opinion.