Sure, ask questions, and then cut any opportunity to answer short by your own answer. The art of debating on MMO-C.
I'll answer regardless. *GASP* How dare I, right?
What makes it inevitable? We're about 7 billions on this planet. Even if a proportion of the population stops to procreate, this number will keep on increasing because there will always be a sizeable number of the population that WILL procreate. Which WILL create overpopulation before we get a chance to find those magical "alternate dimensions" you mentioned. That issue will create a shortage of resources at a certain point, which would in turn lead to a population decrease, whether controlled (but socially opposed by people ignoring the issue) or as a consequence of letting things go (ie: mass famine, civil/global wars for resources, social collapse).
It happens in the animal kingdom. Just because we can do more than animals doesn't mean we're 100% shielded from that cycle.
But hey, don't take my word for it; I don't expect you to. I expect you to twist it and ridicule it.
Unless you give us the secret to those "alternate dimensions" so we can end up dwelling there. You seem quite well-versed on the topic, so I'll let you explain how we can get there, savior of humanity.
Last edited by McTroll; 2017-08-10 at 02:46 PM.
No it isn't. There is also no Santa Clause
Nope not true, they are getting less valuable by the day, as more are produced.
No, also not true, and if his forfathers are the same dipshits that believed all that white supremacy bullshit then they are for sure better off fucking dead. Because we already have enough of that stupidity white or any other color.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
True indeed! There are many elements to what keeps our population growing. People not having children is not going to suddenly start a decrease in population. Basically, it is perfectly fine that people do not have children. If anything it is one of the many things that helps keep us in check.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
Did I at any point fault foreigners for having kids? Nope, In fact I complimented them as being more vibrant and productive. I faulted us for not having them, and pointed out the simple arithmetic that if both trends continue, their culture will replace ours. Now if you're fine with that, you've nothing to worry about. For those of us however who value our cultural identity, it's a problem, and we're not racists for thinking so.
Rich? No. But you'd definitely have far more disposable income on a month to month basis.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
Well you would be right about that, because the fresh boat of nonsense you wrote would be a great example.
Define work in by your definition because being born white isn't a job.
You don't have a demo outside of Stormfront
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Or people with diseases/conditions they don't want to pass on (my brother-in-law doesn't want kids because his dad has Alzheimer's and he himself has a decent chance of developing it according to doctors, and he doesn't want to put a child/potentially pass that off to his child).
I also have a few conditions that make me very disinclined to have children, and would require a hell of a woman to convince me to have them.
This thread literally feels like a breeding ground of those righteous people who think children are like the bane of the earth, ignoring themselves being children, possibly being little arseholes to their own parents and potentially surrounded by children who are parented by those with lower incomes.
Sorry, did you like lose out because children come from all walks of life? Are you going to lose out because children are born every generation? Narrow-mindedness will dictate you say yes, otherwise knowing the economy you'd understand they are a benefit in the long run.
What you lose in money for a child, you gain experiences and memories you'll never have without children.
There's no right or wrong answer but sorry, being up your own arse about these choices is beyond a joke. It's not your life or choice on what other's do. Get over it.
Last edited by Evangeliste; 2017-08-10 at 02:56 PM.
That isn't how this works, I am calling out your nonsense, and you choosing to not respond is irrelevant, your fucking race is not especially unique or special there isn't anything pure about being inbreed which is just about the only thing that white nationalistic bullshit is about. Genes are actually made better by diversity, this is a fucking fact, and right now there are more than enough people to keep the human population and civilization going forever, whether that is the kind of world you wouldn't be in because you're a dinosaur not withstanding.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Then why are you in this thread at all? You stated that the state needs soldiers. If the state needs them, then they have value. But value is subjective, so there's no point in discussing it.
Which isn't my argument. My argument is that the state benefits from having 'more than zero'.State doesn't need as many physicists as they can get.
They CAN. This is not a guarantee they WILL. Right now the US is importing them. And right now the President wants to start actively restricting that. Or relations between your state and your largest source of brainpower deteriorate, and immigration is restricted. Or another state is able to offer a more lucrative deal. And so on.Not to mention they don't even need to produce them in the state. They can import them (see USA).
By simply refusing to provide an in-house source you are putting the state at a disadvantage for no real reason.
Who has a segment of their population that they have educated to make practical use of such.And cutting edge technologies? See China.
I was speaking broadly about a population containing an educated technically proficient segment in general vs a population of just grunts/soldiers, so no.You are confusing scientists with engineers. I don't think a Stealth bomber technician is a scientist nor is the pilot a physics major more like Air Force Major.