In open public like that, no expectation of privacy so no violation of privacy. While touching her to distract her might be sexual harassment, the picture itself by definition again, is not. I think you are so blinded with anger/hatred you don't even realizing people agree with you that this is horrible. However, as the laws are at the moment, those things you keep saying, are not true.
Also, her taking the phone is theft, not self defense. You spouting about the whole 'medieval shit hole/civilized world' crap doesn't help your argument. Your feelings are in the right place, but you are factually wrong, need to learn to separate the difference.
I really don't see why people make such a big deal out of up-skirting not being legally punishable. So some guy takes a pictures of your hoo-ha with or without panties on in public. There are hundreds of millions of nudes floating around the internet and you are not even a tiny blip in that pile. I have some out there myself, and I couldn't give a fuck less what people do with them. So someone out there may be having a happy ending to my pics, I say whatever floats your boat dude. Honestly, it makes me a little flattered.
Girls dislike this because the female body are the goods, and they don't want anyone getting a loot at the goods for free. You gotta pay through money and commitment for that privilege!
As a person that likes the male rights movements such as MGTOW, thank you up-skirters.
Last edited by nanook12; 2017-08-12 at 01:49 AM.
I am fascinated that this thread is close to 20 pages, yet some people still argue that showing a phone between someones legs and taking a photo is not a breach of privacy/harrasment and is totally fine, she "dressed for that".
Internet sometimes is not great. Nor are backwards people.
I was running around on the beach in my thong when my dick popped out and somebody took a picture so I killed myself.
"I'm not stuck in the trench, I'm maintaining my rating."
"The selection form focuses on a partial and weaker (and easier to refute) representation of the opponent's position. Then the easier refutation of this weaker position is claimed to refute the opponent's complete position."
L2read.
Bikini pictures Vs upskirt pictures =/= sex and rape.
Back to the castle for your my white knight.
-=Z=- Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek! -=Z=-
https://bdsmovement.net/
So guy was getting creepy and you let him put is hand and phone between your legs?...k
They assume that legal recourse being taken against a man who used a phone to violate someone's privacy to fulfill his perverse desires is an attack on themselves as men, and so therefore become complete dense sticks in the mud to stick up for him.
It's similar to people who defend people who "manspread" and take up two seats. They feel that any and all attacks on what they perceive to be "displays of manliness" are further denigrating their already, usually weak, sense of manhood.
It's not too many steps away from "blahblahblah the matriarchy blahblahblah"
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
I was born in South Korea, I don't live in South Korea.
You can walk around your own house naked if you want to. You can't expose yourself to the public view though.
Upskirt pictures goes under this here:
Word or gesture intended to insult the modesty of a woman
509. Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Last edited by Freighter; 2017-08-12 at 08:24 AM.