Having people with riot gear making a pseudo phalanx makes dispersion much more difficult.
I've been through the academy. There's not a whole lot of training on dealing with mobs of people equipped in their own riot gear and weapons. That's usually reserved for SWAT, riot control, and the National Guard.
Just because you didn't say it was true, doesn't mean you were not spreading misinformation. That's the point. You don't have to believe it in order to spread it.
You did spread information. Was that information correct, or was it shown to be false via video evidence presented to you?
What do YOU think happened? It's a simple question, yet you are continuing to dodge it.
Do you think allowing such Nazi protests to happen in the first place might create danger towards people? Given who these people are, their goals of ethno nationalism etc and that many were heavily armed?
Like we are not talking mere fucktards spewing shit on /pol/ any more. They have real, violent goals.
VA Code § 18.2-46.4 (2014)
"Act of terrorism" means an act of violence as defined in clause (i) of subdivision A of § 19.2-297.1 committed with the intent to (i) intimidate the civilian population at large; or (ii) influence the conduct or activities of the government of the United States, a state or locality through intimidation.
Driving into a crowd of opposing protestors almost certainly qualifies. And intimidation is pretty much what this whole event was about. Unless he is actually insane his "mental stability" is no defense.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Okay - Why is it wrong to be a white nationalist?
Now i think identity politics is fundamentally stupid, but white people thinking of themselves as a group is no more right or wrong than when anyone else does it.
Like affirmative action?It's support for discriminatory policies.
So when you say nazi you are just using it as rhetoric - You shouldn't do that.The Alt-Right is Nazism without the name, the symbols, or even the explicit rhetoric.What fucking white privilege?But the undercurrents, the dogwhistles, the wink winking, the end-point - preserving or expanding White Privilege in America - is all there.
Stay away from the progressives Skroe.
In any case, i say again, White nationalists engaging in identity politics is no more right or wrong than when anyone else does it.You know the point of the 'Hitler did nothing wrong' meme isn't to say he didn't do anything wrong, it's to say that they don't give a fuck if they are called 'Nazis'.I just want to go back to every dumb discussion that this forum has had about the Alt-Right and its memes. You know why the memes matter? Because they're a central part of the plausible deniability of the Alt-Right. All the Alt-right is, is Nazism with plausible deniability.
People just using 'Nazi' as rhetoric has denuded it off meaning.
The protests should be allowed to happen. People should be allowed to coutner those protests. None of that justifies the use of violence. Not. One. Bit.
They always had violent goals, now they just have an administration that is more to their liking, and they feel they can get out of the closet about their ignorance and hatred.
I do not want to take away anyone's freedom to peacefully protest.
Correct. Normal police officers in the US are not armed or trained to deal with a situation like that where the people they're trying to halt are already in their own riot control equipment.
SWAT, riot control units by the state police, and the National Guard get that type of training.
I do have a question though. Protests/Counter-Protests are pretty much the norm. Police do a good job at keeping them far apart from each other.
So what the hell happened here? I mean terrorist attack aside, there were dozens of incident of assault because the two sides got close. That's very unusual.
Did the local police just not have the resources? Was the State unable to provide? I was in Pittsburgh for the G20, back in 2009 I think. That was wild. But the cops handled it. How did it even get to this point in terms of keeping the two groups apart?
He's spreading misinformation, plain and simple. He was simply trying to dodge by saying he "read" it, so that it wasn't him saying it. that's a fucking cop out. That's the same as me saying I "heard" Trump raped a woman. I'm still the one spreading that information.
In his case, he is repeating information that was shown to be false. That is misinformation. Yes, misinformation can come in the form of speculation, as is often the case. That's why I specifically asked him multiple times what he thought happened, so there would be no attempt at ambiguity. He has refused to answer such a question.
Last edited by Machismo; 2017-08-13 at 12:06 AM.