Stop with the Naga Playable dream

[huth]

Side saddle would clip on mounts, so it would need to be unique per mount

As if the other races didn't.

[zlygork]

Side saddle would clip on mounts, so it would need to be unique per mount

Same applies to Normalish sitting animations. Legs can clip as much as a tail.

[Cæli]

not a problem of armor, playing a naga makes literally no sense
would they do a giant seagull and snails as playable race ? same nonsense

[huth]

not a problem of armor, playing a naga makes literally no sense
would they do a giant seagull and snails as playable race ? same nonsense

They might. If they think it's a good idea.

You on the other hand haven't actually given any reason why it wouldn't make sense.

[Redroniksre]

Same applies to Normalish sitting animations. Legs can clip as much as a tail.

More than legs on creatures with wings, unless it is a skinny tail. My bet is on them giving Naga legs regardless.

[George Costanza]

Agreed have enough furries for 55 expansions.

[huth]

Now come on. The only fur on naga is what the ripped of some other creature and wear as clothing.

More than legs on creatures with wings, unless it is a skinny tail. My bet is on them giving Naga legs regardless.

Why would they? Might as well just use Saurok then. Making playable Naga have legs would defeat the point of making them playable in the first place.

[zlygork]

not a problem of armor, playing a naga makes literally no sense
would they do a giant seagull and snails as playable race ? same nonsense

1. Snail sounds like an interesting idea
2. Naga has been an established race that people have been wanting to play since warcraft 3 only Ogres could arguably make "more sense" than Naga

- - - Updated - - -

More than legs on creatures with wings, unless it is a skinny tail. My bet is on them giving Naga legs regardless.

You claim this based on what, exactly? The fact that a naga tail is bigger than a human leg? Do remember that tauren and gnomes get on the same mounts

[Cæli]

They might. If they think it's a good idea.

You on the other hand haven't actually given any reason why it wouldn't make sense.

how do you think they would ride horses without falling and do bladestorms ? why would they attack their own in older raids ?
simply it does not feel right, I understand the community like cool stuff, this would simply discredit them after seeing them in some situation that would make them look retarded

[MechaCThun]

The naga are an inherently evil race.

Sure some unique characters show that not all naga are evil (to a degree) and are capable of moral rationalization. However, they are few and far between.

Certainly beings twisted by the Old Gods into serpentine monstrosities, with nothing but malice for everything living above the sea, would not choose to ally themselves with factions that dwell... ABOVE THE SEA.

A lot of head canon mixed with the unnatural desire to play a snake-man leads to the forgetting (or willful ignoring) of this fact. Some races in the game exist to be antagonistic, with no rhyme or reason as to why they could possibly exist as the opposite.

[Biske]

Trolls, Tauren, and Goblins don't wear boots.

Goblins wear boots. Draenei don't, though.

[Deventh]

not a problem of armor, playing a naga makes literally no sense
would they do a giant seagull and snails as playable race ? same nonsense

It makes a lot more sense than a playable panda that's for damn sure.

[Cæli]

It makes a lot more sense than a playable panda that's for damn sure.

well at least anthropomorphic pandas can actually do what the other races do

[Powerogue]

The naga have tails they use to be their lower half. Theoretically, they "could" wear pants. But there's zero possibility they could ever wear boots. Blizzard just won't do this. Any new race will be bipedal.

Stop your nonsense.

That's never stopped tauren. Or draenei.

[Filipse]

They've been stated by Chris Metzen as wanting to be a playable race (along with goblins, pandarens and ogres), and has been playable in many Warcraft 3 Maps, as far as 10 years ago, it's just one of those things that get constantly teased as playable, they've also got BY FAR the most lore out of any other viable options as of right now, as Ogre's realy lack much substancefull lore beyond what happened to them in Warcraft 3, they're more likely than Mur'Loc's and Ogres based off having more established heavy-lore.

They're more likely than any other race right now interms of established material and gameplay teasing them as playable, deal with it.

PLAYABLE NAGA'S OR GTFO~

[zlygork]

how do you think they would ride horses without falling and do bladestorms ? why would they attack their own in older raids ?
simply it does not feel right, I understand the community like cool stuff, this would simply discredit them after seeing them in some situation that would make them look retarded

How do gnomes not fall of their mount?

How do worgen kill their own in old raids?
How do all the other races kill their own in contemporary raids?

[The Moscovian Candidate]

Blizzard can make anything happen if they have the desire. That's how art works.

[Cæli]

How do gnomes not fall of their mount?

How do worgen kill their own in old raids?
How do all the other races kill their own in contemporary raids?

gnomes still have legs, and nagas have no reason to cooperate with the horde or alliance, it would simply feel forced as I said, doesn't feel right

[Darktbs]

The naga are an inherently evil race.

Sure some unique characters show that not all naga are evil (to a degree) and are capable of moral rationalization. However, they are few and far between.

Certainly beings twisted by the Old Gods into serpentine monstrosities, with nothing but malice for everything living above the sea, would not choose to ally themselves with factions that dwell... ABOVE THE SEA.

A lot of head canon mixed with the unnatural desire to play a snake-man leads to the forgetting (or willful ignoring) of this fact. Some races in the game exist to be antagonistic, with no rhyme or reason as to why they could possibly exist as the opposite.

Yes use lore agaisn't the implementation of something, it worked before it will work again...oh wait.

[Armakus]

Playable Naga is as likely to happen as Tinker class.

Sooooo... extremely likely? Extremely unlikely? The vagueness here is killing me.