Last edited by Strangebrew; 2017-08-20 at 09:08 PM.
Ive already proved him wrong on his assertion that the figures of communist death toll were inflated because of counting famine
only time famine was counted if it was proven to be deliberate
Famine, economic growth, and happiness[edit]
Rummel included famine in democide if he deemed it the result of a deliberate policy, as he and most academics have concluded about the Holodomor. He has said that there have been no famines in democracies, deliberate or not.[18] He also argued that democracy is an important factor for economic growth and for raising living standards.[19][20] He has noted research showing that average happiness in a nation increases with more democracy.[21]
According to Rummel, the continuing increase in the number of democracies worldwide will lead to an end to wars and democide. He believed that goal might be achieved by the mid-21st century.[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Rummel
don't think we will see him back in this thread he has a tendencies to disappear when you prove him wrong
Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism,[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce,[3] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
You are correct. If you delete the word nationalism though, you have a near perfect description of Antifa's ideology.
The only word in that definition that applies to the vast majority of Trump supporters on the other hand, is Nationalist.
So by that score, it seems the only people more fascist than Antifa are some fringe neo-nazis and Klan members, who were not Trump's key constituency, I assure you.
Last edited by ArguesWithStrangers; 2017-08-20 at 09:16 PM.
Not sure what you even think you're proving, at this point. That communism deliberately killed less people than capitalism accidentally killed? How is that a "win" for you?
1> Stalinism, not communism. "Communism" refers to a wide range of political viewpoints, and this stuff doesn't apply to a lot of them.
2> Not "defending" it; you can see an earlier post where I very clearly described Stalin and his regime as "monstrous". But making up bullshit serves nobody; we don't need to pad the books to make Stalin look even worse, he looks plenty horrible if we just stick to the actual facts.
Was not contesting that at all. It's included in the numbers I was using, and I condemned the stuff in Ukraine (not specifically, but along with all the other horrors committed by Stalin) already.
Not very, really. And feel free to check back into the sources; if you do a reasonable comparison of fatality rates in all communist nations since 1979, and democratic capitalist nations in that same time frame, India alone beats the death toll just looking at 1947-1979.How much older is capitalism compared to communism?
Which isn't me blaming democratic capitalism; it was largely incompetence and poverty and so forth. Nor is it me suggesting that Stalin's purges were A-okay; they were horrible atrocities.
I'm arguing we should stick to the facts, and not cite biased propaganda pieces like the Black Book of Communism which exaggerate those facts and don't apply their methodologies to both sides.
Billions? Citation fucking needed.
Posting the same link over and over doesn't "prove" anything.
If you really want to continue the (relatively stupid) "whose death toll is higher" game, here's some attempts to quantify Capitalism's death toll, by comparison.
Just recall; you're citing Scott Manning at ~150 million for communism.
http://guerrillaontologies.com/2014/...ms-death-toll/
Puts capitalism's at 205,000,000
http://www.spectrezine.org/global/chomsky.htm
Hits well over 100,000,000 just looking at India since 1947, adding the rest of the world would easily surpass Manning's total for communism.
And so forth.
I'm arguing that body-count-competitions are a stupid game to play in the first place, and that it's outrageously dishonest to play that game without looking at both sides. You're acting as if that 150 million that Manning cites is "awful", and that the values for "Capitalism" would be "zero", and that's just obviously false.
Their MO of setting fires, verbally attacking anyone who doesn't agree with their narrow ideology, looting business and attacking bystanders who are filming, throwing huge rocks into crowds and assaulting people with flag poles is all anyone needs to know about Antifa. Disgusting.
These are all things I've seen on YouTube footage from people who have gone to these clashes and filmed. So, yes I acknowledge this as fact. I have been following this topic for almost a year.
Tim Pool, Fleccas Talks, Lauren Southern, Luke Rudkowski (and many others) have footage on their YouTube channels of Antifa violence. There's also the big one #BikeLockProfessor attack (the one that riled up 4chan) that you can check out just by looking through posts with that hashtag.
Anyone who is just finding out about this 'alt-left' violence just now because of Trump has a lot of catching up to do.
The black flag covering the red flag symbolizes VIOLENT anarchy followed by communist revolution. Look it up if you think I'm wrong. These Antifa people know exactly what it means.
thelibertarianrepublic.com/yes-can-reject-antifa-commies-alt-right-nazis-time/
While nationalism is meant to be a part of it the main things people attribute to fascists are a natural tendency to use violence to achieve their goals and lack of respect for individual rights if someone disagrees with them. So complaining how antifa lacks a nationalist/racial element and can't be called fascist while possibly having an element of truth to it doesn't actually exonerate them on the main things most people attribute to what being a fascist really entails: People who achieve political goals through violence and intimidation.
They're trying to bait the right. Keep a cool head, Trump will handle it; look at how he has helped us put the spotlight on Antifa violence with the 'alt-left' statement. Now their movement is on a timer because of public scrutiny.
I encourage everyone to post any Antifa-related information they can find on social media.
Last edited by Reverb256; 2017-08-20 at 09:32 PM.
so now you went from democratic capitalism to just capitalism nice switch
Famine, economic growth, and happiness[edit]
Rummel included famine in democide if he deemed it the result of a deliberate policy, as he and most academics have concluded about the Holodomor. He has said that there have been no famines in democracies, deliberate or not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Rummel
but ok we will go with capitalism
The history of capitalism has diverse and much debated roots, but fully-fledged capitalism is generally thought to have emerged in north-west Europe (usually specifically England) in the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_capitalism
sixteenth to seventeenth centuries that is how old capitalism is so please list all the famines that happened after the 16th century in capitalist countries that was blamed on economics and not by mother nature then give the death toll
I'm arguing we should stick to the facts, and not cite biased propaganda pieces like the Black Book of Communism which exaggerate those facts and don't apply their methodologies to both sides.
once again not using the communist black book using the research done by R.J. Rummel
and the figure is over 140 million so stop using that straw man
What, so you can burst into tears when legitimately confronted like 90% of those 'superior race' men in Charlottesville?
- - - Updated - - -
Was Britain not a democracy at the time? Guess it doesn't count when it's brown natives in the colonies dying.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi