Male feminist turns out to be a piece of shit. What a giant shock.
1. I enjoy his movies. And Firefly.
2. You can label him feminist if you like, but I prefer human. Turns out, humans make bad choices. ALL humans make bad choices and under the right conditions are capable of making bad choices.
3. Including, I'd wager, most of us making posts about his bad choices.
4. I think I messed up the bullet statements.
You come from the greatest country in the world. Act like it.
Well I think you come across the point that I was somewhat confused about. That both feminists and none feminists, find it a bad thing to do, which then makes the point confusing that it is this rare case of hypocrisy that needs immense exposure (I mean freaking heck, we could have daily threads on feminists and hard line family value conservatives and everything in between, cheating on their spouse).
Also I agree with the notion that it is straight out douchy, no matter who/what you support.
Thats great and no he does not have to label himself but there is no "in between" here.
You're either for equal rights or you're not. This is one of thoes cases where there are no grey areas.
In any case, you can be an asshole even if you're for equal rights. Cheating has nothing to do with feminism.
No he's a communist because he made a thread in the suggestions forum demanding that all right wing opinions be banned off the site.
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...porting-Nazism
That grey area? That's feminism. If you think women should have equal rights and opportunities, you're a feminist.
The entire point is that this isn't an extremist or fringe viewpoint; the majority of people fit this definition. However, some people (like yourself), don't understand the label, and lash out at it for something it isn't.
And don't start with the "no, that's egalitarianism" stuff again; feminism is a particular subset of egalitarianism. They aren't separate and conflicting things; it's like trying to argue that chocolate ice cream isn't ice cream, because it's chocolate and there's more flavors than that in the category of "ice cream".
Unless it specifically contradicts their political position, like if they were strongly in favor of 1:1 man:woman marriage-until-you-die etc, then no - it's their personal life. So Jim Bakker is a good example of hypocrisy - guy thinks cheaters should be stoned to death, guy is a serial cheater.
In the case of Bill Clinton, who never specifically took such a stance, no - it never should have been a political football to be tossed around - because he never took any stance like that: no hypocrisy with his political platform. What ended up being a political issue was lying under oath, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" 'Oh, blowjobs and fingerbanging her count as sexual relations?'
In a better world than ours, he never should have even been asked that question under oath because it was irrelevant, and/or he should have been able to answer it honestly and not have it end his political career: "ya, she blew me, my wife's fine with it, why do you ask?"
Republican politician speaks to teen cancer survivors, tweets a picture about it. Joss Whedon tries to make a joke about the politician making a pass at a number of the teen cancer survivors. The expected happens, Joss Whedon apologies, say's he'll leave twitter for a bit, starts posting again the day after.
Pretty average twitter drama.