After reading it he's basing it literally on just the fact that people were being fed meat. So ya, easy to disregard bullshit.
By the modern sense of the word he just means they were fed well. That's his reasoning. They're fed well, so they're not slaves."REDDING'S faunal evidence dealt a serious blow to the Hollywood version of pyramid building, with Charlton Heston as Moses intoning, "Pharaoh, let my people go!" There were slaves in Egypt, says Lehner, but the discovery that pyramid workers were fed like royalty buttresses other evidence that they were not slaves at all, at least in the modern sense of the word."
They're not slaves, they're just obligated laborers..."People were not atomized, separate, individuals with the political and economic freedom that we take for granted. Obligatory labor ranges from slavery all the way to, say, the Amish, where you have elders and a strong sense of community obligations, and a barn raising is a religious event and a feasting event."
So ya, whether you want to call them slaves or "obligated laborers" I don't think the terminology matters.
In response to his, "They're fed well so they're not slaves," and, "They're obligated laborers, not slaves," I'll just mention that 3 religions that survive to this day are rooted in a book that said they were slaves. Which is more evidence than that guy is going on, with a whole lot less mealy mouthed half words.
I wouldn't say nothing to do with traitorious part, but the main part is slavery. Like the part where these guys wanted slaves so bad they turned traitor on their country and were more than willing to kill countrymen so they could have them. This during a time when people were realising slaves are humans too, so you can't even say they are a product of their time like the founding fathers.
You don't hold it against someone for doing things normal of the time. You do if times are changing and they are willing to turn traitor and kill to resist said progress. Still, it really comes down to loosers don't get trophies. Had they won there would surely be lots of monuments to them with no one looking to tear them down. But they didn't, they lost and lost decisively.
Who "white-shamed" you? Let me guess...no one.
This does seem to be a modern trend with the right...manufacture non-existent grievances and imaginary repression.
Btw I dunno where your going but if you like the whole white pride thing then you should stay in the US. Most people outside the US aren't that backward in their philosophy.
Yes, it should be in a museum but no, you cannot shelter yourself from your past. Tearing down the statues of what is considered to some, the big meanies and others, the heroes or people of inspiration or heck, even warning about not forgetting where you came from.
If a statue sets your mind that you aren't equal, then I apologise, but that is also about oneself.
At this rate, almost all your statues has some sort of bad omen. Fuck, are we going to pull down some of the old buildings because they were used by people owning slaves?
To be honest, you do you, and I'll have a seat over here while people are going at it with older buildings and more. Sorry, but obviously we cannot agree that in a way, you are trying to shelter the masses from your history while you as well, feel it is for the better to not have it at all.
FOMO: "Fear Of Missing Out", also commonly known as people with a mental issue of managing time and activities, many expecting others to fit into their schedule so they don't miss out on things to come. If FOMO becomes a problem for you, do seek help, it can be a very unhealthy lifestyle..
No no, you have to remember that in the early 20th century there were a lot of people acting shitty and enacting jim crow laws and erecting statues to honor people who fought for slavery.
That shit deserves to be remembered and condemned not whitewashed, honored, and excused.
It is incomprehensible to me that "white nationalists" are celebrating a man who came closer to destroying to the nation than King George, Adolf Hitler and Osama Bin Laden. Seems like they just like the racism part and don't care much about the patrotic bit.
- - - Updated - - -
Then it should be placed in its proper context. Put up statues representing abolitionists and slaves next to them.
The problem with that is that bigots would vandalize the modern statues. So removal is the only option.
If you just let the statues stand as they are then they are a glorification of slavery.
@Gray_Matter I'm not really sure why this was infracted. Unless you're taking a political stance when you're supposed to be monitoring the forums. His image was 100% on topic and not spam in any regard.
Not okay with that. Take the statues down. I think you missed the point of my post, it was reinforcing your point.
You can remember history if you're taught it in a history book. We shouldn't whitewash that history or we get idiots who think the civil war was fought over anything but slavery. And those monuments help whitewash that history.
- - - Updated - - -
From the rules:
Brief guidelines to follow: (Please read the extensive rules found here for more in-depth information)
Do not post spam, meme images or nonsense text.
Also, take up your issues with mods in PMs not the forums.
Because the majority of the U.S still isnt as fucking stupid as the nazis and antifa fools
WORLD POPULATION
U.S pop 318.2 million,Mexico pop 122.3 million ,Russia 143.5 million S.K 50.22 million China 1.357 billion ,United Kingdom 64.1 million, Europe "as a whole" 742.5 million, Canada 35.16 million, South America 387.5 million,Africa 1.111 billion , Middle east 205 Million , Asia "not counting china" 3.009 B ,Greenland 56k,, Iceland 323k, S/N pole 1k-5k/2k
When only 1 side of an issue is being addressed and singled out by mods you're damn right I'm gonna call them out on their bullshit. It happens way too much with the mods on this site playing god in a children's playground, just banning people and removing comments because it doesn't mesh with their political opinion.