Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    The Lightbringer MrPaladinGuy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wherever the pizza is
    Posts
    3,278
    Quote Originally Posted by ali725 View Post
    retarted
    10850k (10c 20t) @ all-core 5GHz @ 1.250v | EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra Gaming | 32GB DDR4 3200 | 1TB M.2 OS/Game SSD | 4TB 7200RPM Game HDD | 10TB 7200 RPM Storage HDD | ViewSonic XG2703-GS - 27" IPS 1440p 165Hz Native G-Sync | HP Reverb G2 VR Headset

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by mistahwilshire View Post
    Vega could be 200 bucks and I'd still pay more for an Nvidia card. Can't put a price on insanely superior quality. AMD is for cheap people who aren't patient enough to save an extra 100 bucks for much better GPUs, then they go on reddit/forums and complain about why their AMD card has terrible support and isn't performing to spec.
    100% this. so true XD


    I like to say AMD is Food Club Sour Cream. And Nvidia is Daisy Sour Cream. $1.99 vs $3.99. Runny, flat and bland. Fluffy, tasty and yummy
    Last edited by Laqweeta; 2017-07-29 at 01:37 AM.

  3. #23
    The Insane apepi's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mostly harmless
    Posts
    19,388
    Please please don't name it 2080....go 1180.
    Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by apepi View Post
    Please please don't name it 2080....go 1180.
    I think that 2080 sounds better, imho.
    "Every country has the government it deserves."
    Joseph de Maistre (1753 – 1821)


  5. #25
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by ali725 View Post
    If amd puts there video card for 700+ in euro they are the worse company in the world and i highly doubt they are that stupid.
    HBM2 is very expensive. So they might need to ask 700 or 800€ to make ANY profit.

    Development costs a lot and we dont know if AMD could afford it.

    The Fury and Fury X were very expensive too. In many tests they were much slower than the 980 ti, but the costs were the same. Took nearly a year to get some good pricing.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Klatar View Post
    HBM2 is very expensive. So they might need to ask 700 or 800€ to make ANY profit.

    Development costs a lot and we dont know if AMD could afford it.

    The Fury and Fury X were very expensive too. In many tests they were much slower than the 980 ti, but the costs were the same. Took nearly a year to get some good pricing.
    I was hoping vega would pressure nvidia to release 11 series sooner but guess not if thats the case. Ill buy a gpu when the prices go back down

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Amalaric View Post
    You would have to be mad to buy a nVidia current gen card right now. http://www.tweaktown.com/news/57177/...017/index.html
    We will see it december earliest, or 2018.

  8. #28
    The Unstoppable Force Gaidax's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    20,863
    Quote Originally Posted by ali725 View Post
    I was hoping vega would pressure nvidia to release 11 series sooner but guess not if thats the case. Ill buy a gpu when the prices go back down
    The what pressure? lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •