it's funny how people think poland deserves reparations but when african american ask for reparations from the US government the usual rhetoric is that the past is in the past
it's funny how people think poland deserves reparations but when african american ask for reparations from the US government the usual rhetoric is that the past is in the past
Germany is the ones who pushed the EU to fine them...
- - - Updated - - -
tell that to affirmative action that still happens today... Until a 4.0 white student doesn't lose his spot to a 3.4gpa minority I will continue to believe that minorities are still getting reparations to this day. Remember the 4.2 GPA prep student who did an article on how she was declined to all but 1 ivy league school (Penn I believe) then reapplied with same everything and check marked african american and was accepted to Every Ivy league school....
Last edited by Moshots; 2017-09-10 at 11:45 PM.
Seriously people who think it's fair to punish Poland over illegal immigrants are fuckin retarded. Next country that wants to join EU should sign a clause about potentially having to take thousands of immigrants.
there is absolutely no evidence to support any of your claims. infact all evidence and history suggests pretty muc the exact opposite of what you said. i do not know where this conversation can go seeing you have such a deluded opinion of the state of the EU, you are unlkely to change your view even in the face of facts.
which is a shame but not uncommon on this forum.
Do you?
Oh I know enough to not trust it. Poland blatantly breaks a treaty and obligation they've signed up to, and now they get punished. It further shows that Poland wants all the benefits and none of the commitment or responsability. Is stating that racist? No.
I live in Sweden. I can only speak of what I've experienced, and this is what I've experienced. Anecdotal of course.
Yes, because it's a common theme with former Soviet countries. Yours was one of them.
I could turn it around on you and ask you what do YOU know of the influx of criminals and theives? You don't live in my country, so you can't have experienced it.
How is it racist? I clarified to you that I didn't mean your entire country are criminals and thieves. Is it racist to say that North Korea is a militant, genocidal dictator ship too or what?
- - - Updated - - -
Obviously I wasn't serious but said it in snarky hyperbole. Do you really need it pointed out to you that I don't sincerely think that Poland sits there deliberately exporting criminals?
Yes now that you point it out, I see why you'd make the comparison. But why? If I were serious, would sounding like Trump invalidate me? It seems like the start of an attempt to attack my person rather than my argument with something like "Well you sound like Trump".
Last edited by Noomz; 2017-09-11 at 12:27 AM.
US' viewing Poland as an ally of strategic importance consists of selling them overpriced junk, dragging Polish soldiers to their shitty, illegal wars and pretending the topic of visa-free travel Poland brings up ever since the fall of communism (pretty much the most consistent aspect of Polish foreign policy, regardless of who holds the power) doesn't actually exist. That aside, the rest of EU has more political weight and as such is more strategically important in terms of alliances, than just Poland. US sticking its nose into EU's internal matters and picking Poland over EU would be a weird hill for US to die on in regards to its relations with EU.
There's a clearly outlined legal basis for one, while it doesn't exist for the other. Tonight on Words 101, the word "difference".
It'd be also a breach of treaties and it'd simply result in another fine.
I don't need you to explain me anything. And your explanation doesn't make your post not nation bashing. Trump didn't mean it literally either, if I recall his squirming correctly. And no, comparing you to Trump is not meant to invalidate you. It's meant to outline that contrary to your xomplaining about unfair moderation (again, brilliant choice of a post to do so), it was nation bashing, because Trump is a racist and that statement was prejudiced when he used it against Mexicans. Besides, even ignoring the above, I'm not sure how it could have looked like the start of an attempt to attack your person rather than your argument, when it followed an attack of your argument.
Poland DOES take refugees. From Ukraine. They dont count just because germany said so? Do you see eastern european countries, that do take those refugees demanding western europeans to take their share? Heck, the quotas werent even unanimously agreed upon, when that happened, they circumvented it and pretended unanimous vote wasnt required... regardless of the fact quotas will never work anyway, noone wants into eastern eu, when they get far better benefits in western eu and when they go there, they just sign papers and move back to germany or france or wherever they want to go, literally every single migrant our country took did just that. Everyone and their mother knows the quotas cant work, at this point its only a political game, germany cant really back down, because it would them, the self proclaimed EU leaders, show, how retarded merkel policy was in the first place, inviting millions of migrants into europe with literally zero infrastructure to handle them and trying to shove them to everyone else, when they coundt handle them.
Ok, but there are two differences between Poles and Ukrainians - 1) there is a war on Ukraine 2) Ukrainians are from outside of EU. I just want to know why a person from Ukraine, who is genuinely fleeing the war should not count, and some people from North Africa should? Just because the Ukrainians don't ask for the refugee status?
Legal obligation is another matter. But legal agreements can be renegotiated, especially ones so controversial.
That was my first thought as well .
- - - Updated - - -
So.. you live in boston, do you honestly think descisions are only made with Massachusetts' interests in mind? The EU is pretty much the same thing as the US, the goal is a united states of europe, because being a little ass wanker country will get you nowhere in the future. The nationalists just haven't realized that yet.
Last edited by Cosmic Janitor; 2017-09-11 at 05:46 AM.
The current state of Ukraine and for example Syria are hardly the same....not sure what you are arguing tbh.
If Poland wants to take people in from Ukraine that's on them because Ukraine isn't in full civil war right now, we can go right now to Ukraine and not be in any danger of being blown up by the Russians, Syrian government, iraqi government, ISIS or US government. This can't be said the same about Syria or Iraq.
I can't find the report ATM, but I do recall reading one. It was from some agency that had like 20k job openings available for migrants, and only a few dozens were filled after months since posting. I think it was linked to one of the German motor companies.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu...-idUSKBN13A22F Here's a readily available article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe...ationality.png
I wasn't aware there are wars in Eritrea, Nigeria, Somalia (arguably), Gambia, Senegal, Mali, Pakistan or the list of other countries the migrants come from. These countries are much farther from war than Ukraine is.
Are Syrians, Iraqis and Libyans refugees of war? Most certainly. And they should be allowed access, at least until things settle down in their countries. Should A SINGLE economical migrant from the shitholes they crawled out from be allowed access under the disguise of a refugee? Absolutely not. If they can pass the standard procedures of immigration into EU countries, sure, you're welcome, but the ones illegally tresspassing into EU borders should be dealt with as every other tresspasser.
Unless you've gone into the warzone, there was no danger of getting blown up by Russians or Ukrainians even when the war was at its peak. That doesn't mean it didn't affect the whole country. Economy is a thing, and ukrainian economy has gone down the drain because of the war, and it was in a terrible state in the first place. So Ukrainians are refugees of war in the sense that they are running from a country whos economy was ruined by war, not that they are running from bombs. One could argue that this year's Syrian refugees aren't really running from war, either, since the war is pretty much over. ISIS is getting mopped up on all fronts and the war doesn't really affect the grand majority of the population anymore, in the sense that they are in danger of dying. The economic damage was obviously much worse in Syria than in Ukraine.