Page 1 of 2
1
2
LastLast
  1. #1
    Deleted

    Rolling Stone, Once a Counterculture Bible, Will Be Put Up for Sale

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/b...zine-sale.html

    From a loft in San Francisco in 1967, a 21-year-old named Jann S. Wenner started a magazine that would become the counterculture bible for baby boomers. Rolling Stone defined cool, cultivated literary icons and produced star-making covers that were such coveted real estate they inspired a song.

    But the headwinds buffeting the publishing industry, and some costly strategic missteps, have steadily taken a financial toll on Rolling Stone, and a botched story three years ago about an unproven gang rape at the University of Virginia badly bruised the magazine’s journalistic reputation.

    And so, after a half-century reign that propelled him into the realm of the rock stars and celebrities who graced his covers, Mr. Wenner is putting his company’s controlling stake in Rolling Stone up for sale, relinquishing his hold on a publication he has led since its founding.

    Mr. Wenner had long tried to remain an independent publisher in a business favoring size and breadth. But he acknowledged in an interview last week that the magazine he had nurtured would face a difficult, uncertain future on its own.

    “I love my job, I enjoy it, I’ve enjoyed it for a long time,” said Mr. Wenner, 71. But letting go, he added, was “just the smart thing to do.”

    The sale plans were devised by Mr. Wenner’s 27-year-old son, Gus, who has aggressively pared down the assets of Rolling Stone’s parent company, Wenner Media, in response to financial pressures. The Wenners recently sold the company’s other two magazines, Us Weekly and Men’s Journal. And last year, they sold a 49 percent stake in Rolling Stone to BandLab Technologies, a music technology company based in Singapore.

    Both Jann and Gus Wenner, the president and chief operating officer of Wenner Media, said they intended to stay on at Rolling Stone. But they said they also recognized that the decision could ultimately be up to the new owner.

    Still, the potential sale of Rolling Stone — on the eve of its 50th anniversary, no less — underscores how inhospitable the media landscape has become as print advertising and circulation have dried up.

    “There’s a level of ambition that we can’t achieve alone,” Gus Wenner said last week in an interview at the magazine’s headquarters in Midtown Manhattan. “So we are being proactive and want to get ahead of the curve.”

    “Publishing is a completely different industry than what it was,” he added. “The trends go in one direction, and we are very aware of that.”

    The Wenners’ decision is also another clear sign that the days of celebrity editors are coming to a close. Earlier this month, Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair and a socialite and star in his own right, announced he planned to leave the magazine after 25 years. Robbie Myers, the longtime editor of Elle, Nancy Gibbs of Time magazine and Cindi Leive of Glamour also said last week that they were stepping down.

    Anthony DeCurtis, a veteran music critic and a longtime Rolling Stone contributing editor, said he never thought Jann Wenner would sell Rolling Stone.

    “That sense of the magazine editor’s hands on the magazine — that’s what’s going to get lost here,” he said. “I don’t know who’s going to be able to step in and do that anymore.”

    Wenner Media has hired bankers to explore its sale, but the process is just beginning. BandLab’s stake in the company could also complicate matters. Neither Jann nor Gus Wenner would name any potential buyers, but one possible suitor is American Media Inc., the magazine publisher led by David J. Pecker that has already taken Us Weekly and Men’s Journal off Wenner Media’s hands.

    The Wenners said that they expected a range of opportunities, and Jann Wenner said he hoped to find a buyer that understood Rolling Stone’s mission and that had “lots of money.”

    “Rolling Stone has played such a role in the history of our times, socially and politically and culturally,” he said. “We want to retain that position.”

    Jann Wenner tried his hand at other magazines over the decades, including the outdoor lifestyle magazine Outside and Family Life. But it was Rolling Stone that helped guide, and define, a generation.

    “Who lives through the ’60s, ’70s, ’80s and ’90s and cannot be somehow wistful at this moment?” said Terry McDonell, a former top editor at Rolling Stone who also ran other Wenner magazines.

    Rolling Stone filled its pages with pieces than ran in the thousands of words by standard bearers of the counterculture, including Hunter S. Thompson — whose “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” was published in the magazine in two parts — and Tom Wolfe. It started the career of the celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz, who for many years delivered electrifying cover images, including an iconic photograph in 1981 of a naked John Lennon curled in a fetal position with Yoko Ono.

    Music coverage in all of its forms — news, interviews, reviews — was the core of Rolling Stone, but its influence also stretched into pop culture, entertainment and politics. A bastion of liberal ideology, the magazine became a required stop for Democratic presidential candidates — Mr. Wenner has personally interviewed several, including Bill Clinton and Barack Obama — and it has pulled no punches in its appraisal of Republicans. In 2006, Rolling Stone suggested George W. Bush was the “worst president in history.” More recently, the magazine featured Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, on its cover with the headline, “Why Can’t He Be Our President?”

    The magazine also published widely acclaimed political stories, including one in 2009 on Goldman Sachs by the writer Matt Taibbi, who famously described the company as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.” The next year, the magazine ran a piece with the headline, “The Runaway General,” that ended the career of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal.

    But that was perhaps the last Rolling Stone cover piece that gained significant journalistic acclaim. And the magazine’s reputation as a tastemaker for the music world had long since eroded, as Mr. Wenner clung to the past with covers that featured artists from his generation, even as younger artists emerged. Artists like Paul McCartney, Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan have continued to secure cover spots in recent years.

    Rolling Stone suffered a devastating blow to its reputation when it retracted a debunked 2014 article about a gang rape at the University of Virginia. A damning report on the story by the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism cited fundamental journalistic failures. The article prompted three libel lawsuits against Rolling Stone, one of which led to a highly publicized trial last year that culminated with a federal jury awarding the plaintiff $3 million in damages.

    The financial picture had also been bleak. In 2001, Jann Wenner sold a 50 percent stake in Us Weekly to the Walt Disney Company for $40 million, then borrowed $300 million five years later to buy back the stake. The deal saddled the company with debt for more than a decade, preventing it from investing as much as it might have in its magazines.

    At the same time, Rolling Stone’s print advertising revenue and newsstand sales fell. And as readers increasingly embraced the web for their news and entertainment, Mr. Wenner remained skeptical, with a stubbornness that hamstrung his company.

    Wenner Media was already a small magazine publisher. But the sale of Us Weekly and Men’s Journal, which together brought in roughly three-quarters of Wenner Media’s revenue, has left it further diminished.

    Regardless, the sale of Rolling Stone would be Jann Wenner’s denouement, capping his unlikely rise from dope-smoking Berkeley dropout to silver-haired media mogul. An admirer of John Lennon and publishing mavens like William Randolph Hearst, Mr. Wenner — who invested $7,500 of borrowed money to start Rolling Stone along with his mentor, Ralph J. Gleason — was at turns idealist and desperado, crafting his magazine into a guide for the counterculture epoch while also gallivanting with superstars. He once boasted that he had turned down a $500 million offer for Rolling Stone, more than he could ever dream of getting for the magazine today. (BandLab invested $40 million to acquire its 49-percent stake in the magazine last year.)

    Though he said he still cared deeply about Rolling Stone, Mr. Wenner has placed the magazine’s fate firmly in Gus’s hands, and he appears content to let someone else determine its path forward.

    “I think it’s time for young people to run it,” he said.

    Sitting in his second-floor office surrounded by a collection of rock ’n’ roll artifacts, Gus Wenner expressed hope that a new owner would provide the resources Rolling Stone needed to evolve and survive.

    “It’s what we need to do as a business,” he said. “It’s what we need to do to grow the brand.”

    Then, as only someone who had spent his life around rock ’n’ roll could, he gestured confidently to a tome of Bob Dylan lyrics on his desk. “If you’re not busy being born,” Mr. Wenner said, “then you’re busy dying.”

  2. #2
    Guess libeling people with a fake rape story really came back to bite them in the ass.

  3. #3
    Deleted
    Rolling Stone is the magazine that had one of the Boston Bombers on the cover isn't it?

    If so, good riddance.

  4. #4
    It's a bit funny that a rock magazine has better political articles then most of the newspapers.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Daish View Post
    good people promoting fake rape stories are just as bad as real rapists they ruin lives of innocent people

    rolling stones magazine deserves to die
    You are talking about a single story over the span of almost 50 years....if Fox News and breitbart could be as accurate in their reporting even a for a year they would probably lose almost all of their readers.

    Rolling Stone made a mistake, their editors didn't properly fet a story which since they are human can always happen. But at least with them we know it;s a mistake since something like that doesn't happen often vs every other right-wing publication who does not have any editorial integrity.

  5. #5
    Deleted
    Who even buys magazines anymore? Seems like a bad investment.

    And I can remember that it more often than not was in the news for all sorts of weird stories and claims.

  6. #6
    Trash mag, you won't be missed.

  7. #7
    A very left wing magazine that doesn't do anything different from what you can find on the Internet. Music reviews? Just go to YouTube and watch it for yourself. And the political articles were left of The Guardian which is pretty left wing.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubcap View Post
    A very left wing magazine that doesn't do anything different from what you can find on the Internet. Music reviews? Just go to YouTube and watch it for yourself. And the political articles were left of The Guardian which is pretty left wing.
    From a historical standpoint, Rolling Stone was significant. It helped show the world the amazing writing of Hunter S. Thompson.

  9. #9
    They should just literally close the page on rolling stone. Any attempt to keep it alive under another owner is just going to be an even bigger joke than it has already become.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Daish View Post
    sorry if you think destroying a persons life is not a big mistake
    No I think a single mistake over the course of 50 years of publication is hardly justification of this hatred.

    But given you're statement I guess you either like crap right-wing propaganda that literally craps out more fake stories a day then a person who has diarrhea.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Daish View Post
    it was not a single mistake they carried on with it and dragged him through the legal system it was horrible

    they carried on about it and harassed so many people dragging a bunch of peoples names though the mud

    So a single mistake over the course of 50 years, not sure how you think you are rebutting my point with this crap.....would like to see your meme sites doing a single mistake a for a week for starters instead of every day.

  12. #12
    Single, as in the sentence

    ''Is there a single conspiracy theory peddled by Alex Jones that ever proved accurate ?''

  13. #13
    I hope Steve Bannon buys it.

  14. #14
    The Unstoppable Force Theodarzna's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    24,166
    It is sad that it had such an illustrious history but will likely fade away known mainly by many for that rape hoax scandal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    i think I have my posse filled out now. Mars is Theo, Jupiter is Vanyali, Linadra is Venus, and Heather is Mercury. Dragon can be Pluto.
    On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.

  15. #15
    But of course, the publications taken as the Gospel by the alt-right, like Breitbart and Alex Jones, are not runining the lives of their targets.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahtasher View Post
    But of course, the publications taken as the Gospel by the alt-right, like Breitbart and Alex Jones, are not runining the lives of their targets.
    Let us know when they are sued for libel and the libeled prevails in court.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobar View Post
    Let us know when they are sued for libel and the libeled prevails in court.
    Pizzagate. Fracking Pizzagate.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Daish View Post
    i dont think you understand what the word "single" means

    - - - Updated - - -
    You keep on talking about a single mistake and keep on linking propaganda pieces....

    The last video comes from a ''group'' that pushed for the stupid genocidal Iraq war, you are talking about ruined lives when you listen to and link crap posted by these homicidal maniacs?

  19. #19
    The Unstoppable Force RobertoCarlos's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Xenu
    Posts
    20,771
    Quote Originally Posted by Helden View Post
    Rolling Stone is the magazine that had one of the Boston Bombers on the cover isn't it?

    If so, good riddance.
    Yep and they tried to make him look like bob dylan

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Daish View Post
    there were many mistakes the truth and facts kept being ignored they pushed the story and ruined the lives of 9 men + anyone who stood by them

    on top of that the woman who made the up the story ended up murdering her boyfriend so a death was also part of this big fucking mess to say it was a "single" mistake is just messed up

    magazines have editors many people hand a hand in this bullshit being published and spread across mainstream media

    i guess you think someone who rapes 1 woman and someone who rapes 9 women he only committed "Rape" so its just a single mistake don't punish him to harshly

    ITS ONLY SINGLE DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
    Compared to the god dam murders you are using as a source yes it's a single freaking mistake over the course of 50 bloody years worth of publication....

    Also not sure why you are blaming that murder on Rolling Stone....

    But I'm done, don;t like to argue in circles where you are agreeing with me in regards to a single story that wasn't properly vetted but still pupping a vein in anger.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •