Bullshit as is proven by this cctv footage spanish police overpower a knife-wielding man as he attacks an officer shouting 'Allahu akbar' near the Spanish-Moroccan border http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...56216793940084
Bullshit as is proven by this cctv footage spanish police overpower a knife-wielding man as he attacks an officer shouting 'Allahu akbar' near the Spanish-Moroccan border http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...56216793940084
Want to play SWTOR again and get 7 free days of subscription access + free ingame goodies: http://www.swtor.com/r/d5LnJT
My reaction is a crazy cuckoo meltdown? Look in the mirror pal, I think you're projecting just a tad lol. I'm responding to your posts and as short and succinct as I can possibly be here responding with: "no, I don't agree with you". Do you always react in such a hyperbolic way when people don't gush with gratitude over your unsolicited subjective (and in my view wrong) advice?
If you don't want to get shot, don't approach police officers carrying a deadly weapon. Not sure why this is even news except for those trying to turn the public against the very people who protect us from lawlessness /shrug
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.” -- Voltaire
"He who awaits much can expect little" -- Gabriel Garcia Marquez
I could get on board with that, if there was a remotely acceptable conviction rate for wrongful arrest or detention cases, and given proper compensation for the person detained.
Getting cuffed, thrown in a squad car, hauled to the station, tossed in a cell, and released 71 hours later without charges, with nothing for your trouble but 3 days missed work and a bunch of bruises, is not an acceptable scenario. We give the police the power to do exactly that, without restriction, and that should not be the case.
Are there amendments that the alt-right agree with ?
Second, for sure, because without it they can't shoot everyone that is not of the right ethnic group. First, because they can't scream they will use the second to execute everyone disagreeing with them.
All the others are for ''SJW beta cucks'', not males with pure blood and very big guns.
I'm aware of the issue, I just have never seen any basis for it being an issue.
Specifically, what equipment formerly used by the military offends you when the police use it? In your mind, what defines "military gear"? I mean, the military has boots and socks, as do cops. The military has helmets, as do cops. The military has fire arms, as do cops. The military has rocket launchers...wait...cops don't have rocket launchers do they?
Be specific. What types of equipment do you think police have, that they should not have, and why? I'm genuinely curious because from where I sit, it seems like the word "military" seems to the big concern. It's like when we are told "military style assault weapons" should be banned, but when you pin them down to specifics, they can only cite the weapons being black, or having flashlights attached as what makes them "military" weapons.
All guns kill people. Every single one of them.
Last edited by Tijuana; 2017-09-21 at 05:42 PM.
I'd be curious for you to offer your expert opinion then.
Clearly the only solution is that a deaf guy walks around with a metal pipe, wielding it as a club for months or even years (long enough for his neighbors to notice, learn why, and accept it as part of the routine).
Or you know, we could again apply some logic to this, and make deductions. But it's fine, the rest of us will handle that part, you just keep on bashing. Wouldn't want to get a headache.