You fuck with the law, the law fucks you. Only the tardish struggle to comply and the fewer tardish the better.
You fuck with the law, the law fucks you. Only the tardish struggle to comply and the fewer tardish the better.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
Being mentally disabled doesn't diminish someone's ability to cause grievous harm to a police officer with a metal pipe.
- - - Updated - - -
According to whom? In the US, it is perfectly legal for a police officer to kill someone threatening them with a deadly weapon. What country do you live in btw?
- - - Updated - - -
Why must people who defend cops be "alt-right"? That is just a way for you to try to marginalize opinions that you don't agree with. Pretty pathetic actually.
Here in the US, according to our laws, you don't need to be alt-right to defend the cops action. You are just simply right!
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.” -- Voltaire
"He who awaits much can expect little" -- Gabriel Garcia Marquez
What goalpost was moved my friend?
- - - Updated - - -
Don’t you know if you don’t agree with him you must be of the “alt-right” persuasion. It is his way of insulting you and getting away with it without gaining an infraction. You could call him anti-fa if you wanted to I suppose.
No video posted so there is nothing to discuss. Or are we all supposed to support/hate either side based on a bullshit article.
It's not the readers responsibility to search out data to support your claim. What kind of a garbage opinion do you have that you can't even be bothered to find your own supporting evidence? What's the point in the first place beyond being sensationalist?
- - - Updated - - -
Did you join and post today in order to use idiotic terms like "tardish?" Why bother?
Last edited by mmocc02219cc8b; 2017-09-22 at 01:25 PM.
Garrison Mission Manager: Select best followers for BfA, Legion and WoD missions.
Instance Spec: Switch to spec suitable for your role when "dungeon ready" pops up.
LDB: WoW Token: Monitor WoW Token price changes in LDB display.
Other addons: Quest Map with Details * LFG Filter for Premade Groups * Obvious Mail Expiration.
US police only method to neutralize a target is with lethal means?
Dosnt matter much if only 1 of the cops used a tazer if the other fucker used a gun, even if u had to use ur gun, dude was wielding a metal pipe, why not just shoot him in the leg?
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Why not use nonlethal force instead of actually shooting him like a fucking idiot??? The cop who tried to taze instead of just straight up shooting is fine. He has a pipe, taze him before he gets close....
Shoot to kill? Why not aim for arm or leg. I'd understand if he had a bomb or a firearm, but a pipe?
It's the gun and frontier culture. In other civilized countries, even bandits were thinking twice before shooting the police; but in USA, deadly violence against the law enforcement is a norm of life.
- - - Updated - - -
Because you cannot aim for anything with a handgun. You will be lucky to hit the torso with the several tries. The handgun is too light, the barrel too short, the caliber too big.
Aiming for the leg is a tactically unsound idea. It's not only unlikely to immediately disable the suspect, it's also likely to result in a mortal wound. You're also far more likely to miss a leg than center-of-mass and hit a bystander. Whoever thinks shooting the leg is a good idea has never had any firearms training.
To everyone else saying you never see cops shooting people in Europe, that's because of a variety of different reasons, very little of the total reason being "American cops are bloodthirsty." Yes, some of them are, some of them are amped-up former soldiers with PTSD that should be making regular visits to the VA instead of showing up for work at a police precinct. However, America also has 300 million guns, and a much more violent and bloodthirsty populace in general. Even if you took all the guns away, and assumed people killed by guns in America every year would not instead be killed using other weapons, like a murderer just decides to opt for a knife, we still have one of the highest murder rates in the developed western world, completely sans firearm slayings. When you throw in the fact that most European cops aren't standard-armed with firearms, but instead rely primarily on batons, mace, and tasers, it becomes pretty obvious why cops in America shoot when they shoot.
Last edited by Shalidor; 2017-09-22 at 05:32 AM.
It doesn't actually matter if a person is deaf if it is approaching a law enforcement officer with a drawn out gun.
Doesn't matter, people without money are considered garbage in this country.
First off, it's not the majority. You have to be hella messed up to actually think the MAJORITY of the police force are nothing but cruel people. Secondly, they don't get "convictions" because they are being judged by individuals that actually understand the job and understand the law and not internet raging kids.
Listen to what the police tells you and you won't get fucking shot.