Komondor. Because I own one, and he's awesome, and the bestest of dogs. His name is Goliath and he enjoys belly rubs and herding small children.
and then he cupped my balls...
My last Dog was an 50 Kilogramm ( about 110 pounds ) potatoe chips thief, couch commando and extraordinary good pulling device while i was wearing inline skates Pitbull. He was also wonderful with kids and cats. I love the breed, highly intelligent on one side and dumb as bread on the other
I also have a german shepherd. They are definitely very intelligent!!
I'd say a Husky.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Golden Retrievers. Friendly, smart, beautiful looking dogs.
Ok, i know what you mean. A breeder who takes his job seriously will get you a healthy dog. The problem is: Some breeds are unhealthy to begin with. The pug, though i like it, is a good example, where humans created a thing that cannot breathe without problems and is prone to die because of it..
Also: Genetic diversity. This may be the biggest problem. As these arbitrary rules for breeds are enforced, you only have a very small percentage of dogs you can actually breed without going against the rules. The problem is that a lot of these dogs have a very small genetic diversity to begin with, especially the ones created 100 years ago. So yeah, in a way this is institutionalized incest. There is a reason why so many cats and dog breeds are prone to genetic diseases.
german sheperd , samoyed, huskies and pitbulls for me (pitbulls have bad fame of being very dangerous but they arent, the fact they are considered dangerous is because 95% of pitbull owners are low IQ wannabe gangster with 0 idea of teaching and having a dog)
pd: i know i may get infracted for the low IQ part but is the truth and there isnt a non offensive way to describe them so i used the less offensive that came to mind
Last edited by azkhane; 2017-09-25 at 03:04 PM.
look at this majestic creature
hit & run posting lol
But that's the thing.
You're never guaranteed a healthy dog, you can just increase your chances by choosing breeders that adhere to health regulations when they breed. The dogs coming in to the vet for cancer, skeletal issues etc etc are of all shapes, sizes and breeds/cross-breeds.
There are healthy pugs, bred by breeders whom care about the health aspect. Are they as bodily sound as a Husky? No, but saying a pug is unhealthy and struggles to live by default is wrongful. The average lifespan of the breed in my country, is 12-15 years. That's better than most larger but widely considered more natural dog breeds.
I am a firm believer that opening the lineage books and "outbreeding" with similar breeds for a generation or 2, should be possible to increase the genetic health of breeds. Sadly, the "muh purebred doge!"-people whom only care about dog shows, will be hard pressed to allow it. I'm sure it'll happen someday though, with new breeders cropping up with a young, fresh perspective.
But some of the goals of pure breeding ARE unhealthy for a dog. The inflated face of the pug, the face of the pitbull. That is an arbitrary rule by breeders and by neforcing them you sow the potential for later problems for the dogs.
I'm well aware that you will get healthy dogs, but thats not the whole story as i tried to explain with genetic diversity. A lot of breeds suffer from specific genetic diseases. I am and was always a big fan of nowergian wood cats. I owned several in my life. The problem with them: After their birth you have to wait for a few weeks, and if a specific disease kicks in they're prone to, they will get euthanized, otherwise they'd die a very painful death after about 1 year.
Thats my main problem with breeding, we are creating artificial breeds and thereby giving them a whole lot of potential problems. And thats not speaking about some of the breeding decisions that are just despicable.