And then there's still the matter of rape, which applies to men and women, but only the raped woman would be forced to carry and give birth to the child of the rapist.
Short of forcefully removing the reproductive organs of every man and woman walking the streets, there is no 100% way to assure you won't get pregnant as a woman, or make someone pregnant as a man. It's rarer in the case of men being raped, but it happens. Women get pregnant from rape every single day though, and fat men sitting on the other side of the planet sign executive orders to stop support for these women's choice cuz "muh religious morals"...
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2017-09-26 at 03:48 PM.
The matter of pregnancy through rape is so statistically low, it shouldn't even be used in arguments, but I will say that rape is abhorrent and wrong and I also think abortion is pretty abhorrent, used only as a last option. Unless the child is threatening the life of the mother, you can always put it up for adoption.
To be fair, saying that rape is proof that abstinence isn't a 100% reliable form of birth control is a bit of a misnomer and deflects attention from the actual problem. Abstinence didn't cause the pregnancy, the *rape* did. In a "normal", "civilised" society people wouldn't *be* raped, so abstinence is indeed a 100% guaranteed way to not get pregnant. That there is a subset of society willing to override abstinence in this way is not a condemnation of the method itself so much as the people who would do things like that.
I see someone's unaware of other countries outside of the 1st world ones.
"You can always put it up for abortion" = the woman would have to carry and give birth to the child. Fuck off, the woman's freedom >> your misguided morals.
I say this as a woman who could never, and never have, aborted a child.
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2017-09-26 at 03:53 PM.
It damn well is important when you claim 100% efficiency on abstinence as birth control. 2-3% of abortions (just in the US) are due to rape. I don't care how insignificant you personally think that is, but saying that it's still 100% effective is ludicrous.
Abstinence AND your choice of BC medication is mighty safe. But you know what? It still isn't 100%.
There was no emotion in my post. I simply don't want to remain pregnant simply because you want me to, sorry. Nor is there a contraception available at this time that ensures I never become pregnant, so I might one day become pregnant again and well, abort again. Sorry in advance!
Your "arguments" are all based in feels rather than reality.
Nice attempt to deflect though. You're clearly hilariously ignorant when you believe that 3rd world abortion being sponsored and often carried out by 1st world countries would somehow take the backseat in quality to those countries adoption systems. India says hello.
If we're including cases of activity the contraceptive method was never designed to counteract (abstinence doesn't account for the possibility of rape, obviously) then the only way to ensure a 100% never-become-pregnant contraceptive would be to eliminate rape entirely. As that's never going to happen, there's not much point in this argument. (note that this does not contradict what I said above, as I was referring to abstinence as 100% effective only in the context of the world we *should* live in where rape simply doesn't happen, and blaming contraception for people intentionally circumventing it is not the problem on which we should be focusing).
I mean, if you never, ever, ever, under any circumstances want to become pregnant at all in any way, there is a hysterectomy, but that's probably not what you were driving at.