There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
This might be the only thing this thread has going for it. It allows conservatives to pretend their friends don't make them irrationally uncomfortable for no reason save for pre-conceived biases and notions instilled by negative stereotypes portrayed constantly in media and white culture.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, getting shot up in a nightclub is a result of me taking too much drugs, whoring myself out and getting tied up in a latex cat suit.
The strawman, please try harder.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
BREAKING NEWS! Personality and sexuality aren't inherently tied together! Back to you, Diane.
"Excluding Pulse victims, 28 Americans who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender were killed in 2016, which was up 17 percent from 24 killed the previous year, according to the annual report. The number of killings last year was the highest since 2012, when 25 LGBT people were killed."
That's not really a lot. Even small fluctuations at that low amount will cause massive increase in percentage.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
It's also plausibly a product of the overall increase in murders during 2015 and 2016:
This year’s rise appears slightly smaller than last year’s dramatic increase. The big cities experienced roughly a 11.3 percent increase in murder in 2016, which is down from the same group’s 14.8 percent increase from 2014 to 2015.
The amount definitely matters if you're going to claim you have a problem related to societal norms with people being killed because of their sexuality. If it's such a low number then that means the issue doesn't stem from society but rather a few select deranged individuals.
Let's take put the scary buzzwords so you don't choke on your own outrage.
Why would Group A praise it's own members for adopting the mannerisms from from Group B? So that group A can be accepted and appreciated by Group B.
It's just a theiory. Calm down.
I only stipulate because I've seen black friends admonished for acting too white and it seems to be the opposite in this case.
Considering it's either Christian or Islam fueled slaughter every other day for all walks of people save for white, straight men?
It makes me look ignorant? For pointing out the fact you're trying to whataboutism LGBTQ death as the communities problem rather than an overarching systemic problem with homophobia? That there makes -you- look ignorant. But hey, looking ignorant and being ignorant are two different things, as you proved with your first post being the latter now that you've doubled down.
Last edited by Blamblam41; 2017-10-07 at 02:20 PM.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
not sure why straight acting is a thing. Maybe ask yourself why people in a community become or people like you pressure them to be a stereotype of it. Granted I haven't spent much time with LGBT people but my partner was friends with one. Found out his email address was supergay something so may not be a representative sample. Gay doesn't mean act, dress or behave a certain way - or shouldnt.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
What a spectacularly dishonest distortion! The notion that straight white Christians are a group that's particularly responsible for LGBT murders is absolutely laughable. Go check out the data - you'll find it's rather unimpressive for the whites-as-villains narrative.
No, the part where you don't really seem to know what "strawman" means is what made you look ignorant. You shouldn't throw around logical fallacies when you flatly don't know what they are. You're doing it again in this post - just because you heard the word "whataboutism" and thought it sounded like a clever refutation doesn't make it so.
Because white guys are smexy. Next