Yet another statistics result. Relation doesn't mean causation.
You save money
a) when the interest you earn elsewhere is higher than what you're paying via credit. I have several retailer-specific cards that frequently run zero interest for x months deals, so if I want something significant from one of these retailers, you can be sure I'll use that option. Put the rest of the money into something that accrues interest for the rest of the duration or whatever you like
b) leveraging cash back cards and paying off the full bill on a monthly basis. Zero interest paid, 1-2% or whatever generated, which can add up pretty well depending on how much you use the card.
Yeah, gotta agree with this. Especially the part where in credit score system having no unnecessary loans, and as such no credit rating, is somehow worse than having bad credit even if you're not behind on your bills and have a steady employment with enough disposable income that'd allow you to safely pay off the loan.
Nothing in @Carbix's post specifically points to cash. Debit cards offer the same convenience, security and sometimes perks (this one may wildly vary depending on your area or even bank) as credit cards (though as far as security is concerned, US cards of any kind are generally barely above those wads of cash) while also being covered by what they said.
I kind of agree, and that's why I chose to live at home until I was 25. But you don't NEED to, just a lot of people prefer it. You can definitely rent your entire life and not accrue any debt from shelter, which brings us to the rent/own debate. I count it as not only do I have full ownership of the property, but it's also an investment. I was willing to invest (go into debt), to help me in the future.
Well I can only speak for the US but a quick Google shows MANY MANY Mortgage companies and lending institutions and varied programs across Eu and the "most" you speak of I am very curious about where one would draw that conclusion as it is nowhere near the truth here and would be very suprised that over 50% of the home owners across the EU either built or paid full sum for their home but would be intersting to read about that
IDK but really my point is doing basic things and being responsible with credit lets you do things like rather than paying rent for say 10yrs @ 1k a month and having nothing is not as sound as buying @850 a month for 10 yrs and at the end owning a asset worth 200k+
I just do not get the upside and you have to have some sort of history to allow one to do so. Totally open to hearing upside of NOT doing so just due to the fact I can't rationalize it in my head.
If it is a good or bad thing bills down to the person using it and how they use it. Ya it can be a trap if you are not responsible but if you arer it is a huge advatage.
Last edited by Cantheal; 2017-10-09 at 04:06 PM.
Just because I don't care does'nt mean I don't understand
I know the voices in my head are not real BUT they have some REALLY good ideas
Some of this is plain wrong.
A high credit utilization rate doesn't mean "you use a credit card a lot." It means you use a lot of your available credit.The reality is that a “high credit utilization rate” (translation: you use a credit card a lot) lowers your credit score because it makes you look like a bigger risk to lenders
the credit is for the plot of land, the house is built by the guy who wants it (and the architect / companies he orders). Mortgage is not given the way it is in the Us, banks do demand securities. One example for getting the land: you wont get credit if u cant pay 20 % of the land on your own as cash, and the bank has full rights to the land until its payed off, and you need an stable income that is 3 times the rate. The house you built is on top of that.
Buying a house that already exists is always extremely expensive compared to building it, the difference is 50 % (if u calculate out the land cost). The most value of a house is not the house itself, its the area it stands on. Land is extremely expensive. Only really rich / good earning people can afford to buy a existing house, most young families that want a house, built it in an area where land is affordable to them.
This, so much. To build credit you have to be in debt, which in itself is a foolish move. Not to say Millennials aren't in debt, but they know enough how to avoid getting deep enough in debt so it doesn't punish them. And the credit score system, which at this point might as well be an achievement system for banks, is a score system that doesn't apply to people who don't intend to buy homes and buy new cars. If you work for minimum wage and live with mom and dad then why care about your credit score?
I don't get it though because it says using your credit card more is a misconception but then it says "If you want to begin improving your credit score, you can start with the basics—buy only what you can afford, and pay off your credit card balance before the end of each month.". Soooo wouldn't using it more in fact improve your score in the end then if you pay before the end of each month? Am I looking at this wrong?
Then maybe schools shouldn't have dumped home economics and civics classes. Can't handle credit or change a tire, but I can FOIL a polynomial like a boss!
Putin khuliyo
Nobody under the age of 30 knew how to build up credit. This is nothing new. Have heard many stories about parents of my friends getting a surprise, when they found out that they had something called credit.
May the lore be great and the stories interesting. A game without a story, is a game without a soul. Value the lore and it will reward you with fun!
Don't let yourself be satisfied with what you expect and what you seem as obvious. Ask for something good, surprising and better. Your own standards ends up being other peoples standard.