Originally Posted by
Raybourne
You keep saying IQ tests are 'knowingly flawed' - usually when this claim comes up it's debunked. What new evidence makes you say they are invalid?
Did you know you can factor out education? Did you know you can do twin studies to capture the variance in IQ based on heredity (if we like, innate intelligence)? If you thought the IQ test was invalid because education might boost one's scores, I don't think you've thought this through, or are aware of any basic stats methodology.