It took Hillary Clinton days to issue this statement.

[Pterodactylus]

He's a huge Democratic donor. They should return all the money he donated.

Most have, and unlike republicans, he won't be elected president.

You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything....Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

- - - Updated - - -

You seemed fine changing the topic, what's the issue now? Don't know how to face facts? SAD!

So much awoke.

[Zarc]

I love how when an individual who supported the Democratic Party is caught doing sexist shit, the right-wingers bash the Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

When somebody who supported the Republican Party is caught doing sexist shit, right-wingers excuse or minimize it. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

Seems to fall into the narrative that right-wingers are more driven by hatred of liberals than actually being passionate about their own ideas.

[Vyuvarax]

I love how when an individual who supported the Democratic Party is caught doing sexist shit, the right-wingers bash the Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

When somebody who supported the Republican Party is caught doing sexist shit, right-wingers excuse or minimize it. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

Seems to fall into the narrative that right-wingers are more driven by hatred of liberals than actually being passionate about their own ideas.

Yuuuuup. Modeen conservatism is absent any kind of integrity or intellectualism. At least conservatism of the '60s, where they believed in raising up the best amongst us and letting them prosper at the expense of the masses, was intellectually honest.

[tyrlaan]

I love how when an individual who supported the Democratic Party is caught doing sexist shit, the right-wingers bash the Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

When somebody who supported the Republican Party is caught doing sexist shit, right-wingers excuse or minimize it. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

Seems to fall into the narrative that right-wingers are more driven by hatred of liberals than actually being passionate about their own ideas.

Yup, they're so hell bent on hating liberals that they don't know how to legislate themselves out of a paper bag. In a way that's a good thing since the GOP run legislative branch can't get any of their hair-brained schemes implemented.

But seriously, they've spent too much time hating that they forgot how to do their jobs. They can't even grasp the concept of reaching across the damn aisle to get something accomplished.

[Hammerfest]

Once it became safe to criticize Weinstein, Hillary (along with that "naaaaaaasty woman" Ashley Judd) spoke out. They're not brave.

[Sormine]

I love how when an individual who supported the Democratic Party is caught doing sexist shit, the right-wingers bash the Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

When somebody who supported the Republican Party is caught doing sexist shit, right-wingers excuse or minimize it. Meanwhile, Democrats bash that individual and sexism.

Seems to fall into the narrative that right-wingers are more driven by hatred of liberals than actually being passionate about their own ideas.

Or when somebody in the Republican Party is caught doing this shit, right-wingers make him President.

[Togashii]

snip

Aww... banned already

[Jotaux]

I dislike Hilary but its good to take time and assess the situation rather than going full Trump and just releasing an uninformed statement.

Almost a year after she lost and Republicans still haven't figured out that pointing at her flaws isn't a substitute for running a competent administration?

Unfortunately the last election proved that pointing out the flaws of your opponent trumps running a competent administration.

[Noradin]

From files of CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politi...ton/index.html

Good for her for finally coming forward and speaking out.

So you do not even take the time to quote what this is about?
Must not mean much more than a +1 in your post count then.

[Allybeboba]

So you do not even take the time to quote what this is about?
Must not mean much more than a +1 in your post count then.

Started threads don't add to your post count my friend. My post count means nada to me. Next thing we know you are going to start asking "likes" and "friend" counts.

- - - Updated - - -

More right-wing deflection.

Deflecting from what? The source was on CNN my friend? Are you right wing or something?

[Kasierith]

Saw this, went to check the news.. and apparently Trump is now publicly raising the possibility of challenging news licenses and freedom of speech over criticisms of him.

It's a bit sad that one can use random "Clinton is evil!" threads to identify when the president is stirring up another controversy.

[lockedout]

You know the rule my friend. Where there are accusations there must be proof. So please provide proof that I am indeed a "Trump supporter". Otherwise you must be a Trump supporter as well, right?

He clearly is.

- - - Updated - - -

Actions speak louder than words. The fact that you're posting an article about Hillary Clinton in October of 2017 is more than enough evidence to support claims of Trump worship.

Or maybe just Hillary disgust.

[DarkTZeratul]

Unfortunately the last election proved that pointing out the flaws of your opponent trumps running a competent administration.

Except that's the thing: Hillary isn't his opponent anymore. She's barely even relevant now. There's no reason to keep pointing out her flaws.

[Felya]

To be fair lol, she knew exactly what kind of man he is, it's a political marriage, nothing more, she will gladly whore herself out for power.

I know he is banned already, but this is bullshit. She had a political career before Bill Clinton and marrying Bill did not buy her any favors. While with Bill, she continued her political work. Including convincing Reagan to increase funding for those who cannot afford a lawyer. While also winning mother of the year and woman of the year in Arkansas. When Bill was president, we were not talking about her shoes, but Hillarycare. So... please... stop spreading bullshit...

- - - Updated - - -

Or maybe just Hillary disgust.

I don't often seek out and post in threads that disgust me. The line between disgust and obsession is incredibly wide...

[lockedout]

I don't often seek out and post in threads that disgust me. The line between disgust and obsession is incredibly wide...

Not often would insinuate that sometimes you do.

[Felya]

Not often would insinuate that sometimes you do.

Yes, I'm not saying I don't. That's why I said the difference is extremely wide. There was nothing wrong or strange in showing your disgust in Hillary during the election. But, she is just a civilian now... you've crossed the wide line from disgusting to obsessed about a half a year ago. Obviously everyone comments on something being disgusting, otherwise you don't know to not be disgusting towards them... but, that's the difference between seldom and often... disgust and obsession...

[Mormolyce]

So if we're done wringing our hands over Hillary Clinton, who apparently received donations from Weinstein in unrelated political campaigns and had nothing to do with his harassment cases, perhaps we can talk about Cyrus Vance, the DA who spiked the investigation into one of the women's allegations that had him dead to rights in 2015?

Who received a donation to his re-election campaign from Weinstein's lawyer shortly after. Kind of seems like those donations miiiiiiiight be a little more pertinent lol.

You know, the same guy who spiked the Jared & Ivanka investigation after meeting with Trump's two-bit ambulance chaser Marc Kasowitz? Who also donated to his re-election campaign on at least two occasions. And later boasted about getting the case dropped.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/c...7-10?r=US&IR=T

But no let's talk about Hillary instead, LOL.

- - - Updated - - -

Story not about Trump, made it about Trump, the butthurt is real. lmao

He says in a thread trying to make a story not about Hillary about Hillary. Kek.

[paralleluniverse]

From files of CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politi...ton/index.html

Good for her for finally coming forward and speaking out.

Shouldn't Hillary shut up and never speak in public again?

And where are the Republicans where are issuing statements against Ailes, O'Rielly and Pussy Grabber Trump? How long did it take?

Oh right, they still haven't distanced themselves from Pussy Grabber Trump despite dozens of sexual assault and rape allegations. In fact, they love Pussy Grabber Trump even more now!

PURE HYPOCRITES.

[Kiri]

Except that's the thing: Hillary isn't his opponent anymore. She's barely even relevant now. There's no reason to keep pointing out her flaws.

She still was the alternative to Trump in the last election. Therefore, when she does something now, certain people feel more justified in having supported Trump. It is the old 'you don't have to be good if the alternative is so much worse' argument that is just as valid to them as it was during the election. That, and the kind of obsession that comes from Trump forcing it during the election.

[Jimmy Woods]

It took Hillary 5 days to release a statement about Weinstein and maybe that's bad. Maybe she should've quickly condemned. Maybe she should've waited for more facts.

It's been 7 days since 4 American soldiers lost their lives in Niger and Trump and his White House hasn't released a single statement. I guess when he can't politicize their deaths Trump doesn't care for Americans dying in his wars. Or maybe Fox and Friends hasn't briefed him yet.