The 24 hour thing, generally is 24 Hours if there are no special circumstances, but that is immediately dropped if you say the person was acting depressed might do something, the person is a minor, the person was making some threats to do something, etc. It is really only in place to keep someone from calling the cops if their spouse stopped at a bar on their way home, slept at a friends house after having a few drinks, etc.
Why isnt it first time caught for penalty?
How many people have a VALID reason for carrying around acid with em in public?
If u do have a valid reason for having, id assume it would be in a sealed container and u would be transporting it with a car,
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
The guy I was replying to was saying how no one would need strong acids. I'm not exactly okay with the government creating a crime out of just owning or carrying an acid.
If a cop catches a guy carrying acid around he can question him and send him on his way after determining the person's reason for carrying the stuff, but jail time for carrying an acid (Even on a second or more offence) seems to be extreme overkill
Last edited by Eldar45; 2017-10-15 at 12:34 AM.
Disagree:
- Should be 6 years at minimum, not months.
- Should be on the first catch without a valid reason.
- Useless law if there isn't actually control and inspections.
- You should be completely afraid of the consequences for going around with that stuff without a strong reason and strong proof.
So how exactly do they plan to spot someone carrying acid? Granted if your waving a big bottle with a massive corrosive symbol on it's kind of obvious but anyone with the smallest amount of brains could easily hide acid in an unmarked container. Are we to believe they'll be random stop and searches with acidic test for all liquids the police find on you? For knives this approach work because a knife is obvious when seen acid is not obvious. Think it needs a severe rethink as this won't achieve much.
Import such cultures? You moron. I'm right leaning and even I can tell you that white kids have been usuing acid in robberies - not just those of middle-eastern origin using it in 'honour' attacks.
This law has been long needed as acid has not been classified as a weapon, ergo the greatest charge able to be brought against someone using it was GBH (Grevious Bodily Harm) as opposed to premeditated attack with a weapon.
With exception to companies and schools, there's no justification to have the stuff in great quantity but the primary reason for the law is to set a president of long prison sentencing for those who use this, previously laxly punished attack method.
- - - Updated - - -
It isn't about catching them carrying it. It's about being able to reclassify it as a weapon to deter it's use. It gets used in the UK as an alternative to a knife/crobar because it's not considered a weapon, ergo carries a dramatically lower minimum sentence for GBH opposed to assault with a weapon.
How would I prove that I carry it around for what ever I intend to do with it later? Do they want to see if I use them on a a fence, battery or something like that? Whacky ass law with little to no practicality. Certainly carring some into a pub or dance club might be immediate cause for concern, but proving it for normal shopping is kinda past the point ..
Edit: It's also kinda telling that chemistry is one of the most neglected subjects in schools these days, when the only use for acidic and base substances seems to be to do some honor-revenge-assault or disolving bodies mafia style in the mind of people. Well that and actually doing shit yourself without calling some professional to put a nail in the wall.
Last edited by Cosmic Janitor; 2017-10-15 at 05:07 AM.