the term leftist confuses me.
leftist just means a person is left wing right... so why not just call them "left"
leftist seems more like a cheap tactic of labelling those on the left synonymous of racists, sexists, etc.
the term leftist confuses me.
leftist just means a person is left wing right... so why not just call them "left"
leftist seems more like a cheap tactic of labelling those on the left synonymous of racists, sexists, etc.
Wow, if your argumentation has dropped from 2nd grade to toddler over being called out for viewing a fairly reliable news network as credible as akin to murder, I think you should be on a watch list for public safety concerns. It clearly is an issue in people with your reality detachment disorder, very similar to the murderer in this instance.
Well being from the UK, I get my news from BBC, Sky, Independent, Daily Mail, Telegraph, LBC, and being a right leaning conservative brexit voter, I follow all the usual suspects that fit my agenda - milo, ben shapiro, tucker carlson, jordan peterson, and some (for the most part) neutral platforms like the JRE.
Go on, tell me again i'm "woke(lol)", "crazy" etc. for holding a polarizing opinion on this topic to you.
Sure, right after you quote where I've said when what I actually said was...
"So, for the record; I assert my opinion that CNN is a garbage news source when it comes to any and all things in the left/right debate, and that it has a much more widespread, visible, and lasting negative influence on the Western world, the USA, and Christian, conservative, values, than this particular, isolated incident of 1 person in 8 billion committing a murder based on polarizing political opinions. In fact, I'd go as far to assert that CNN, Fox news, and any other media outlet pushing their political agenda is partly responsible for this man's actions, who would likely have been completely unmotivated politically had the the media not driven the current political climate to the state it is in today."
Here you go:
"No, believing CNN is a decent news source is worse. 8 billion people, most are garbage, world won't miss 1-2 and years from now definitely won't remember them. So, yes, CNN is definitely worse, given they have the power to influence millions of lives, and make millions of dollars at the same time. At least the murderer in question will get what he deserves."
You literally said it was worse.
Now, back up your claim, or retract it.
You mean my "argumentation" where I debunked your predictable yet unfounded observation that that -
qualifies me as a "toddler"? Damn toddlers are getting smarter these days (no thanks to CNN!). Being "called out for viewing a fairly reliable news network as credible as akin to murder" really? When did I make that claim or express such a view? Answer = Never. You've genuinely yet to quote me on anything real and make any form of "argumentation" other than call me "2nd grade", "toddler" and "crazy". Pathetic to be honest. You're just getting salty now.
The phrase "partly responsible" is a clear indicator that you're trying to establish that CNN's broadcasts are more to blame than the killer himself. Additionally, including Fox News in your claims only strengthens your bias and shows that you're a Trumpkin that blames CNN for everything. /s
It really is a shame the lengths people will go to strawman others so they can easily dismiss them.
- Christopher HitchensPopulists (and "national socialists") look at the supposedly secret deals that run the world "behind the scenes". Child's play. Except that childishness is sinister in adults.
Probably a lot more unsolved murders from that group. Their entire thing was fear and intimidation before Trump era and now they are trying to rebrand themselves as peaceful and just want Open Dialogue™ but they can't help whats in their nature.
Well, you did it right here:
"No, believing CNN is a decent news source is worse. 8 billion people, most are garbage, world won't miss 1-2 and years from now definitely won't remember them. So, yes, CNN is definitely worse, given they have the power to influence millions of lives, and make millions of dollars at the same time. At least the murderer in question will get what he deserves."
That has been your comments all along. You are trying to say that CNN (and believing it to be a decent news source) is actually worse than murder.
You made a claim against me. Are you going to retract it, or are you going to back ti up with quotes/thread?
Ah now you see, where I come from, a sentence such as the one I've constructed, making references to specifics, such as CNN not being a decent news source, and having a larger impact on specifics regions/groups/values encompassing millions of people in a negative way (in my opinion), and becoming stinking rich off of the back of it, being worse than a single isolated incident, one in which I and the other 99.999999% of the population are unaffected, is generally considered to be not the same as the complete generalization that you have wrongly accused me of making, in that "CNN is worse than murder" implying CNN, the company, all news it reports, any and all activity that takes place there, including promotions, investments, charitable donations, employment, etc. is literally just worse than all cases of murder, regardless of the individual, motive, whether it was past or present.
Back up your implication based on evidence taken directly from what I have actually said and not what you have wrongly assumed I have said based on you not being able to read or just being a fucking retard, or retract it.
- - - Updated - - -
See above /10char
I literally quoted what you literally said. It was a word-for-word quote. It was post #87
You made a claim against me, and have yet to back it up. Are you going to retract that claim, or are you going to back it up with the thread and quotes? I assume by your continued attempts to dodge, that you clearly cannot find what you are looking for, but don't want to admit you were wrong.