1. #1381
    Popadopoulos was cooperating with the investigation for months. I wonder if he supplied Mueller with inside info/notes/possibly wearing a wire.

    They might have some folks saying special stuff on tape.

  2. #1382
    Okay I'm back. And I've litterally had "From Russia With Love" in my head all day.


    So anyone commit any treason in the last few hours?

  3. #1383
    Old God Milchshake's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposter Burn Out
    Posts
    10,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Okay I'm back. And I've litterally had "From Russia With Love" in my head all day.


    So anyone commit any treason in the last few hours?

    Here's something from the wayback machine. Well last year.

    Papadopoulos, sitting at Trump’s “National Security” table AFTER having met with the Russians.
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...25628465680386


    I spy the Christmas Elf That Recused Himself as well.

  4. #1384
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post

    Formal charges:
    -Conspiracy against the United States (count one)
    This seems vaguely worded.
    what exactly does this mean? All i get is a bunch of gibberish when I google it.

  5. #1385
    So I was reading this on and off between work meetings today. In my opinion, this is the essential and definitive "Prominent Lawyer explains it" Twitter thread of the day. It's super long but very informative. I can't possibly post all of it, but here are the highlights. The entire thing is worth the read.

    https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...88111880417280









    The next 30 tweets unspool the case. Very interesting. But too big to post here.


  6. #1386
    Quote Originally Posted by mvallas View Post
    Holdup... it appears Manafort and Gates pleaded "not guilty"?

    Seriously?

    Well - that certainly doesn't seem to fit into a plea-bargain deal like we thought it may. >_<
    Gates had a publicly appointed attorney. If I had to guess, he and manafort were sharing an attorney and didn't exactly see eye to eye on how to proceed, so gates decided he'd better get his own council, but couldn't in time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudol Von Stroheim View Post
    I do not need to play the role of "holier than thou". I'm above that..

  7. #1387
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Realitytrembles View Post
    This seems vaguely worded.
    what exactly does this mean? All i get is a bunch of gibberish when I google it.
    Manafort laundered huge amounts of money for Russia, lied about it, lied about absolutely everything. He represented one of Putin's homies illegally to launder the money. And lied about it. Also there was no collusion.

  8. #1388
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripster42 View Post
    Gates had a publicly appointed attorney.
    The fuck? What kind of shit show is this? Isn't he a millionaire?

  9. #1389
    Quote Originally Posted by Realitytrembles View Post
    This seems vaguely worded.
    what exactly does this mean? All i get is a bunch of gibberish when I google it.
    Good explainer:
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41807131

    In a 1924 case, Hammerschmidt v. United States, Chief Justice William Taft (who was US President from from 1909 to 1913) defined "defraud".
    "To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money," he said.
    "But it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest."

    What is the punishment?
    A maximum of five years in prison. "If found guilty, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both," the law says.
    The maximum fine is $250,000 (or $500,000 for organisations).

    But - if found guilty of other offences - longer sentences can apply.

    When has the law been used before?
    The broad nature of the law means it has been used against a wide range of people.

    In 2005, computer hacker Jeanson James Ancheta was indicted under section 371 for using "botnets". He pleaded guilty in 2006 and was sentenced to five years in prison.

    Section 371 was also used against Jeff Skilling, the former chief executive of energy firm Enron. He was jailed in 2006 for 24 years, which was reduced on appeal to 14 years.
    Basically it's an extremely broad charge (intentionally) that allows prosecutors wide leeway to accusing individuals of "defrauding" the United States in some way, defrauding not necessarily meaning money.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Slacker76 View Post
    Here's something from the wayback machine. Well last year.

    Papadopoulos, sitting at Trump’s “National Security” table AFTER having met with the Russians.
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...25628465680386


    I spy the Christmas Elf That Recused Himself as well.
    Seth Abramson in my post (2 above) directly references that picture/meeting in his superthread. This may be the meeting that is the one that ties everything together.

  10. #1390
    FINALLY there is some ACTUAL collusion evidence with that PandaLapDance guy. GG guys. Trump presidency = rekt. What is really strange here is that all these people came directly from the RNC. Bigger investigation seems warranted.
    Last edited by GreenJesus; 2017-10-30 at 10:16 PM.

  11. #1391
    Looks like more reporting coming out indicating the likely hood that Popadopoulos was wired for 3-4 months for phone calls/meetings etc...

    Can't wait to find out what they caught...

  12. #1392
    Quote Originally Posted by Leobald View Post
    Of course they would plead not guilty. Don't get it why people seem surprised about that.

    We can't know how far negotiations between Manafort, Gates and the Mueller team have gone, or if they have even started yet. But before there is a plea agreement in place, there is absolutely no reason for any defendant to plead guilty. They can always change their plea later.
    Hrmmm... I guess that does make somewhat sense I suppose. =/

  13. #1393
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur4stuff View Post
    Looks like more reporting coming out indicating the likely hood that Popadopoulos was wired for 3-4 months for phone calls/meetings etc...
    Definitely time to kick the trash can and see what scurries out.

  14. #1394
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    defrauding not necessarily meaning money.
    Shot in the dark: could Russia have asked Trump for the compounds Obama closed?

  15. #1395
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,550
    Quote Originally Posted by ctd123 View Post
    I'd actually be suprised if Trump doesn't escape this. And i don't mean just because he probably only has about 8 summers left before old age gets him. Billionaires do not face the same justice as the rest of us.
    I have a nagging feeling that he will as well - but not because of the reasons you list.


    This isn't a huge takedown (otherwise the entire establisment would be shaking).
    I'm not sure what it would take to constitute a huge take down. Out of the gate he gets a guilty plea - from a guy they've been talking to since July. Much can be said from this alone.


    The fact that Manafort is going to fight it and tie up courts for years is pretty telling.
    Mueller isn't going to be tied up - Manafort is. And as he's facing his trial, he can think about how much time he wants to spend in jail protecting someone who no longer acts as if he's alive.


    Theres still a huge amount missing. (also will anyone go after where the dodgy Manafort money came from?)
    And this is why I think the establishment IS shaking - there is still so much more to go. And, again, not to beat a dead horse, but a guilty plea out of the gate is YUGE.

  16. #1396
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur4stuff View Post
    Looks like more reporting coming out indicating the likely hood that Popadopoulos was wired for 3-4 months for phone calls/meetings etc...

    Can't wait to find out what they caught...
    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/ex-...-dial-a-crook/

    Relevant link/context.

    If he's been wired for months, then there is likely going to be a lot of soiled undergarments in need of changing and a lot of people replacing sweaty sheets every night for a while.

  17. #1397
    Somewhat related but breaking news in the Washington Post.


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.dde31bd1aa4a

    I'm going to repeat what I said. If it turns out Zuckerberg, any Facebook executives, or individuals at Google Leadership knew or found out about Russian interference in the campaign, and then chose to cover it up either in 2016 or 2017, they must leave the company.

    And we need to start having a serious discussion about breaking up Facebook and Google. And probably Microsoft and Apple while we're at it. But thats a larger issue.

    Lastly, will some patriotic Billionaire do the right thing and buy Twitter, just to shut it down by the end of the week?

  18. #1398
    Merely a Setback Adam Jensen's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sarif Industries, Detroit
    Posts
    29,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Well remember, he retroactively predicted them. Give him some credit, his hindsight is as 20/20 as everyone else's.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Podesta.

    No really. It's all they have.
    Manafort -> Podesta -> Hillary -> Pizzagate -> Birf Certificate -> Obama assassinated Kennedy in '63.
    Putin khuliyo

  19. #1399
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Lastly, will some patriotic Billionaire do the right thing and buy Twitter, just to shut it down by the end of the week?
    FOREVER.

    That giant 140 part tweet you linked part of earlier (135, plus 5 PS posts) is a prime example of why it's a completely useless platform.

  20. #1400
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Somewhat related but breaking news in the Washington Post.


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.dde31bd1aa4a

    I'm going to repeat what I said. If it turns out Zuckerberg, any Facebook executives, or individuals at Google Leadership knew or found out about Russian interference in the campaign, and then chose to cover it up either in 2016 or 2017, they must leave the company.

    And we need to start having a serious discussion about breaking up Facebook and Google. And probably Microsoft and Apple while we're at it. But thats a larger issue.

    Lastly, will some patriotic Billionaire do the right thing and buy Twitter, just to shut it down by the end of the week?
    I read that picture you linked with the chain of 140 tweets that could have been just one Facebook post. That is absurd. Twitter is a horrible way to communicate information and needs to just die. Please.

    All twitter leads to is people only reading 140 characters without any facts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •