Popadopoulos was cooperating with the investigation for months. I wonder if he supplied Mueller with inside info/notes/possibly wearing a wire.
They might have some folks saying special stuff on tape.
Popadopoulos was cooperating with the investigation for months. I wonder if he supplied Mueller with inside info/notes/possibly wearing a wire.
They might have some folks saying special stuff on tape.
Okay I'm back. And I've litterally had "From Russia With Love" in my head all day.
So anyone commit any treason in the last few hours?
Here's something from the wayback machine. Well last year.
Papadopoulos, sitting at Trump’s “National Security” table AFTER having met with the Russians.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...25628465680386
I spy the Christmas Elf That Recused Himself as well.
So I was reading this on and off between work meetings today. In my opinion, this is the essential and definitive "Prominent Lawyer explains it" Twitter thread of the day. It's super long but very informative. I can't possibly post all of it, but here are the highlights. The entire thing is worth the read.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...88111880417280
The next 30 tweets unspool the case. Very interesting. But too big to post here.
Good explainer:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41807131
Basically it's an extremely broad charge (intentionally) that allows prosecutors wide leeway to accusing individuals of "defrauding" the United States in some way, defrauding not necessarily meaning money.In a 1924 case, Hammerschmidt v. United States, Chief Justice William Taft (who was US President from from 1909 to 1913) defined "defraud".
"To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money," he said.
"But it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest."
What is the punishment?
A maximum of five years in prison. "If found guilty, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both," the law says.
The maximum fine is $250,000 (or $500,000 for organisations).
But - if found guilty of other offences - longer sentences can apply.
When has the law been used before?
The broad nature of the law means it has been used against a wide range of people.
In 2005, computer hacker Jeanson James Ancheta was indicted under section 371 for using "botnets". He pleaded guilty in 2006 and was sentenced to five years in prison.
Section 371 was also used against Jeff Skilling, the former chief executive of energy firm Enron. He was jailed in 2006 for 24 years, which was reduced on appeal to 14 years.
- - - Updated - - -
Seth Abramson in my post (2 above) directly references that picture/meeting in his superthread. This may be the meeting that is the one that ties everything together.
FINALLY there is some ACTUAL collusion evidence with that PandaLapDance guy. GG guys. Trump presidency = rekt. What is really strange here is that all these people came directly from the RNC. Bigger investigation seems warranted.
Last edited by GreenJesus; 2017-10-30 at 10:16 PM.
Looks like more reporting coming out indicating the likely hood that Popadopoulos was wired for 3-4 months for phone calls/meetings etc...
Can't wait to find out what they caught...
Shot in the dark: could Russia have asked Trump for the compounds Obama closed?
I have a nagging feeling that he will as well - but not because of the reasons you list.
I'm not sure what it would take to constitute a huge take down. Out of the gate he gets a guilty plea - from a guy they've been talking to since July. Much can be said from this alone.This isn't a huge takedown (otherwise the entire establisment would be shaking).
Mueller isn't going to be tied up - Manafort is. And as he's facing his trial, he can think about how much time he wants to spend in jail protecting someone who no longer acts as if he's alive.The fact that Manafort is going to fight it and tie up courts for years is pretty telling.
And this is why I think the establishment IS shaking - there is still so much more to go. And, again, not to beat a dead horse, but a guilty plea out of the gate is YUGE.Theres still a huge amount missing. (also will anyone go after where the dodgy Manafort money came from?)
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/ex-...-dial-a-crook/
Relevant link/context.
If he's been wired for months, then there is likely going to be a lot of soiled undergarments in need of changing and a lot of people replacing sweaty sheets every night for a while.
Somewhat related but breaking news in the Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.dde31bd1aa4a
I'm going to repeat what I said. If it turns out Zuckerberg, any Facebook executives, or individuals at Google Leadership knew or found out about Russian interference in the campaign, and then chose to cover it up either in 2016 or 2017, they must leave the company.
And we need to start having a serious discussion about breaking up Facebook and Google. And probably Microsoft and Apple while we're at it. But thats a larger issue.
Lastly, will some patriotic Billionaire do the right thing and buy Twitter, just to shut it down by the end of the week?
I read that picture you linked with the chain of 140 tweets that could have been just one Facebook post. That is absurd. Twitter is a horrible way to communicate information and needs to just die. Please.
All twitter leads to is people only reading 140 characters without any facts.