Same thing now, some classes are OP comapred to others and some are much better at one thing then some other class/spec.
I can agree that a druid back then was a healer ( even though i played in raids/dungeons as a balance ) or that warrior was best tank that required lots practice with stance dance but that was the fun part. But as I said i dont see much difference than what it is now. PPl still ask for certain classes or specs because they are much better suited for some tasks.
Because you want something easy....
And bold part isnt true, i took a break from Mythic raiding and im ilvl941 just from doing m+. You can get better gear in +15 ( i wont count tier ) then you can get in mythic raiding where you need to "share" the loot with 20ppl ( well less but you get the point ) + you can do unlimited amount of M+ per day ( you are only limited by time and sanity ).
Look at private server raiding, classes in use is EXTREMELY limited. Talking 40 man guilds running 10+ mages only viable melee being rogues + warriors and hunters used to a minimum and only really cuz of 'tranq shots'
Raiding on private servers is class stacking taken to the extreme.
In the 75% percentile for Mythic all DPS specs perform within 15% difference between the top and the bottom. 200K difference. If you want to play an Outlaw Rogue or Frost DK now, you'll still do fine in most content. Back than some specs simply had extremely poor design, differences were way off. Still, hybrids that were forced into roles.
But yeah, if people want to relive that, I just can't understand why.
I disagree with you but well....
Make your own group? You got into a mythic raiding group thats good and able to clear bosses, some are not able to do HC its the same with M+.
- - - Updated - - -
Do you know how much is a 200k difference now when you mentioned it? For top guilds ( i know that you'll say its not a good example ) sometimes 1% difference matters, what do you think, how much 15% matters? And doing 200k more ( provided that ppl have same skill ) is much more appealing than doing 200k less, right?
I just wanted to note that a year or more ago, I remarked in one of these threads that they'd never, ever do classic servers.
Well, I was 100% wrong. And I try to make it a habit to come back and say so. I missed this boat, and not just by a little bit.
Most likely this is the only way they can bring me back as a paying customer. Then again.. I don't like the "paying" part, might actually prefer to stay at private servers. In the end I'll make my decision based on what they will and/or will not change. For example, if they even as much as THINK for the second of adding different difficulty modes to raids, I won't touch this shit with a stick.
A lot of argument here is going from one extreme to the other. Just like what Blizzard did with WoW. They took it from somewhat clunky, difficult vanilla with multiple issues to mind numbingly simplified, "efficient", watered down Legion. They never found a happy medium that didnt have to go off a cliff. Well, with wotlk perhaps, but that didnt last did it.