Originally Posted by
Drutt
The accuser's account states she agreed to rehearse the skit leading up to the kiss, not the kiss itself, but when they got there he grabbed her behind the head, forced her to kiss him and slipped his tongue in.
That is 100% sexual assault if true. No, it's not as bad as rape, but it's still wrong. It's worth noting that he says he remembers things differently.
The photo looks to me like he actually does have his hands on her chest. If he didn't, it just in poor taste. If he did, again, sexual assault. The fact she's sleeping isn't relevant.
The photo does somewhat undermine his semi-denial of the forced rehearsal kiss, since it shows him doing a (potentially) inappropriate thing to her on film. I say "potentially" because there is some discussion over whether or not he's actually touching her. To me, it looks like he is, but that could just be the angle.