People failed to give me any reason why they would tolerate a Horde with Blood Elves in it where their best possible gain is to be the meatshield für the blood elves while they party in their nice forrests would be more logical than they joining an Alliance with Humans where they have the chance to conquer Quel'thalas finally, after millenia of occupation.
First, no not easily.
Second, both the High Elves and the Void Elves would rather become hostile to both factions then remain with an Alliance that contains the Amani. Especially if the goal is to give Quel’thalas to them at the war’s conclusion.
And third the Amani just plain don’t fit the Alliance. They hate humans, they lost the war because of humans.
This is all assuming the Amani even exist anymore, they’re a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the size they were during the Second war due to being slaughtered THREE times by Alliance and Horde forces since then.
Adventure Guide
For millennia, the Zandalari kings were laid to rest within the tombs of Atal'Dazar, secluded high atop the mountain Mugamba. These pyramids grew more elaborate with each passing ruler, as new rooms were constructed to house the deceased's vast wealth. Now, these once pristine halls have been corrupted by the Prophet Zul and his trusted lieutenant, Yazma, who seek to twist the power of these ancient kings for their own dark machinations.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Atal%27Dazar
Yeah, but a leader that is pragmatic enough to join the Horde would be probably intelligent enough to see that the Alliance is the better ally. After all, they are the people who are holding the majority of the continent, while the Blood Elves are basically the last bastion of the Horde left on the eastern Kingdoms and if they participate in the war in the name of the Alliance, they can win their lands back.
May the lore be great and the stories interesting. A game without a story, is a game without a soul. Value the lore and it will reward you with fun!
Don't let yourself be satisfied with what you expect and what you seem as obvious. Ask for something good, surprising and better. Your own standards ends up being other peoples standard.
What leader? Zul'jin joined the Horde, Zul'jin also died in BC.
- - - Updated - - -
Truthfully, we should have gotten Amani back in BC. Forcing Blood Elves into the Horde was a bad move. Our faction's now dominated by them, your faction has to put up with "Void Elves" as a compromise... Nobody wins.
This is a great topic to bring up. I've wanted to play as a forest troll for a while now, they've always seemed like a reasonable candidate for a playable subrace and now that we have allied races coming, it's the icing on the cake. Unfortunately, Zul'jin died back in TBC, so they'd be lacking a well-developed leader. With that aside, the Revantusk are just asking to become an allied race. We've helped them in Vanilla and Cataclysm, we've seen them as Krom'gar in Stonetalon Mountains and a few helped during the Darkspear Rebellion in MoP...well we're assuming they were Revantusk. Also, forest trolls were with the Horde back during the Second War.
Stromgarde is a warfront and that's awfully close to the Hinterlands. I'd imagine the Revantusk would come to the Horde's aid as the Wildhammer would the Alliance's. I also want to point out that the Revantusk gave out quests to take over Jintha'Alor, so that can be their racial hub. Just needs some revamping. Here's another factor though...population. Well, here's my logic: if the void elves are able to be playable, the Revantusk forest trolls should be able to be playable. Oh and potential classes: death knight, hunter, mage, monk, priest, rogue, shaman, warlock, warrior.
I believe the Amani currently have no canon leader, or at least not one we're acquainted with as of Legion. Warlord Daakara died in Cata, and his successor Kazra'jin died at the Throne of Thunder during MoP. Presumably someone has stepped up to the plate at this point but I don't think we've met them, and probably won't unless they factor into BfA on some level.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead