Page 46 of 102 FirstFirst ...
36
44
45
46
47
48
56
96
... LastLast
  1. #901
    Old God Captain N's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Resident of Emerald City
    Posts
    10,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Felya View Post
    Wealthy like Trump need to start charging people for vicariously living through them. Otherwise, it’s a massive hand out to the delusional...
    Oh man could you imagine the amount of money they'd get just from the shills around here who always claim it's jealousy when we discuss income equality?
    “You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X

    I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)

  2. #902
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Maybe Puerto Rico should stop trying to get all the benefits of being a state while refusing to become one. When they vote to become a state and start paying US income tax, then this kind of thing wont happen
    Wanna try that whole statement again but this time with the knowledge that they did vote and Congress are butt fumbling the whole thing. Then you'd actually be right.

    Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866

  3. #903
    Thirty percent of our income is rental. I still don't know if this is good or neutral.

    Winner: Rental Real Estate Owners

    It is a great time, however, to be a landlord. For starters, the life over which you can depreciate your property has been reduced -- from 27.5 years to 25 years for residential property and from 39 years to 25 years for nonresidential property. In addition, while most other businesses will find their interest deduction limited under the Senate bill, that limitation doesn't apply to landlords, who can continue to deduct their mortgage interest in full.

    Real estate owners will really enjoy a windfall, however, if the final bill adopts the House version of "pass-through" taxation. Under the House bill, all rental income will be subject to a top rate of 25%, as opposed to 39.6% under current law. Under the Senate bill, however, it appears that for those large landlords earning more than $700,000 annually, unless the rental properties or a management company pays out significant W-2 wages, the owners would be stuck paying a top rate of 38.5% on the income, a rate 13.5% higher than under the House bill.

  4. #904
    Quote Originally Posted by kaelleria View Post
    Also I find I cannot respond to Orlong without completely going off on him.
    I'm finding the same thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Woods View Post
    LOL never change guys. I guess you won't because conservatism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    I do care what people on this forum think of me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    This site is amazing. It's comments like this, that make this site amazing.

  5. #905
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasulis View Post
    Thirty percent of our income is rental. I still don't know if this is good or neutral.
    Well, the depreciation thing, if your properties are under 25 years old than no effect.

    The "pass-through" is a big deal. Near as I can tell -- someone please correct me if I'm wrong -- a "pass-through" business normally has to pay 70% of its income as personal income, as you are paying your wages to yourself, and the remaining 30% uses this new lower rate.

    Unless, based on what you quoted, unless you're a landlord. In which case, the whole thing goes by the new lower rate. Now, maybe when you said "thirty percent" you were already talking about the above...in which case, in theory, you would need to get out the new brackets and compare. But it looks like, to me, you'll come out ahead. At least, on this topic. Hope you don't have medical expenses or kids in college.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Two new polls

    Two new polls released Tuesday showed the GOP tax bill is deeply unpopular with the American public.
    A Gallup poll showed 29% of Americans approve of the bill, while 56% disapprove.
    A Quinnipiac poll showed 29% approved and 53% disapproved.

  6. #906

  7. #907
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Maybe Puerto Rico should stop trying to get all the benefits of being a state while refusing to become one. When they vote to become a state and start paying US income tax, then this kind of thing wont happen
    lol, shocking you could not even take the time to google the results of the last vote and republican congress was unwilling to allow this to procede to the floor for debate or a vote.

    i mean its simple. you go to google, you type it in.

    guess making it up is easier since you only have to go to 1 web site

  8. #908
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Two new polls

    Two new polls released Tuesday showed the GOP tax bill is deeply unpopular with the American public.
    A Gallup poll showed 29% of Americans approve of the bill, while 56% disapprove.
    A Quinnipiac poll showed 29% approved and 53% disapproved.
    Wait until they find out that republicans plan to plunder medicare, medicaid, social security and welfare to give more money to the rich.

  9. #909
    The Insane Kujako's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In the woods, doing what bears do.
    Posts
    17,987
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Two new polls

    Two new polls released Tuesday showed the GOP tax bill is deeply unpopular with the American public.
    A Gallup poll showed 29% of Americans approve of the bill, while 56% disapprove.
    A Quinnipiac poll showed 29% approved and 53% disapproved.
    Fake news! Those polls don't ask the real voters, the big money donors. Remember, money is speech, so if you really cared about this you would have given more money!
    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.

    -Kujako-

  10. #910
    Quote Originally Posted by Zan15 View Post
    guess the stock market did not even like the plan


    .2% gain on dow

    1% loss on nasdaq

    .1% loss on sp 500

    .2% on russell 2000


    possibly all the bump has already happened because of the plan, now the break back down to reality?

    a lot of really huge profitable companies are really not going to save a whole lot of money since they already pay dirt low taxes to begin with.



    Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
    Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
    More
    With the great vote on Cutting Taxes, this could be a big day for the Stock Market - and YOU!
    4:03 AM - 4 Dec 2017

    OOPS.....


    Day two of the tax plan passage

    -.5% dow
    -.4% SP500
    -2% Nasdaq
    -1.2% Russell 2000


    hmm, things are looking great after the tax plan passed senate....lol
    Last edited by Zan15; 2017-12-05 at 11:00 PM.

  11. #911
    With a ~50K income as a single filer who takes the standard deduction, I'll be a winner with this Tax bill. My tax rate will go from 25% to 22%, and my standard deduction doubled.

    This bill has winners and losers, but the winners are more often Rich people. The removal of the health insurance mandate is going to cause health exchange prices to soar. Doesn't affect me as much since I have an employer health plan (which isn't going anywhere) -- but that doesn't change the fact that it is an irresponsible move since many people rely on the exchange for insurance.

    IMO they clearly haven't thought out this bill very well -- or they just don't care. Probably the latter.

  12. #912
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Frosteye View Post
    With a ~50K income as a single filer who takes the standard deduction, I'll be a winner with this Tax bill. My tax rate will go from 25% to 22%, and my standard deduction doubled.

    This bill has winners and losers, but the winners are more often Rich people. The removal of the health insurance mandate is going to cause health exchange prices to soar. Doesn't affect me as much since I have an employer health plan (which isn't going anywhere) -- but that doesn't change the fact that it is an irresponsible move since many people rely on the exchange for insurance.

    IMO they clearly haven't thought out this bill very well -- or they just don't care. Probably the latter.
    Oh, they've thought it out. It benefits exactly who they want it to benefit, the people that pay them. These are people who would rob their grandmother in the street for pocket change, so of course they don't care about the poor. Their attitude is "I've got mine, fuck off".

  13. #913
    Quote Originally Posted by Frosteye View Post
    With a ~50K income as a single filer who takes the standard deduction, I'll be a winner with this Tax bill. My tax rate will go from 25% to 22%, and my standard deduction doubled.
    Temporarily. Under the Senate bill that little extra bit you save (which gets smaller every year) turns into a loss by 2027 - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...n-three-charts

  14. #914
    Quote Originally Posted by Akaihiryuu View Post
    Oh, they've thought it out. It benefits exactly who they want it to benefit, the people that pay them. These are people who would rob their grandmother in the street for pocket change, so of course they don't care about the poor. Their attitude is "I've got mine, fuck off".
    The poor do seem to get shafted since they rely on more specific deductions and credits. But it does benefit a fair amount of the middle class. Unless you get your health insurance on the exchange, then you're screwed.


    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Temporarily. Under the Senate bill that little extra bit you save (which gets smaller every year) turns into a loss by 2027 - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...n-three-charts


    Oh wow. Yeah that's rough. Basically they're dangling a carrot for the middle class to get on board with the Tax Plan right now, and they'll yank it away later?
    Last edited by Frosteye; 2017-12-06 at 12:00 AM.

  15. #915
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,001
    Bernie kept the receipts.




  16. #916
    Quote Originally Posted by Frosteye View Post
    Oh wow. Yeah that's rough. Basically they're dangling a carrot for the middle class to get on board with the Tax Plan right now, and they'll yank it away later?
    Yes, and most of the corporate tax cuts do not have any expiration last I remember checking.

    The hope is that the temporary, short term, minor tax cut that many lower/middle class families will get will be enough to get them to shut up in the immediate future. That will give them back some popular support, if it goes to plan, and give them cover for when the rates start going back up for folks that aren't wealthy.

    It's actually far more complex, as there are a lot of other factors like where you live that come into account (high-tax states get fucked hard due to the removal of state tax deductions, states with expensive areas get fucked because there's no accounting for cost of living etc.), but the long and short is that this is going to fuck a lot of folks in the mid-long term in addition to having pretty bad impacts on the overall economy.

  17. #917
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Frosteye View Post
    Oh wow. Yeah that's rough. Basically they're dangling a carrot for the middle class to get on board with the Tax Plan right now, and they'll yank it away later?
    Does it really count as "yanking it away" when they're forced to publicly admit they're taking it away? I don't remember the time Lucy said "Hey Chuck, you know I'm going to yank the football away, right? Right? Okay, go for it."

    They are literally counting on their voters to be intentionally ill-informed. The information is right there. They are choosing to ignore it.

  18. #918
    Titan Lenonis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,394
    Quote Originally Posted by hakujinbakasama View Post
    Secondly, I agree with the removal of the mandate. In my eyes and others, it was illegal. It was a tax and one that forced many to decide how they were going to get fucked. Not something I personally respect from a government.
    Why is the mandate bad but forcing hospitals to treat the uninsured good? Why is forcing the insured to pay for the uninsured good?

    Still waiting for answers to those question from people who oppose the mandate.

  19. #919
    The Insane Kujako's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In the woods, doing what bears do.
    Posts
    17,987
    Quote Originally Posted by Frosteye View Post
    Oh wow. Yeah that's rough. Basically they're dangling a carrot for the middle class to get on board with the Tax Plan right now, and they'll yank it away later?
    Funny part is they are simultaneously saying that the deficit effects wont be so bad, because they have the cuts expire, AND saying that the cuts wont expire, because they will just get renewed later. But no mater what, they can't have a deficit cost above ~1.5 trillion over 10 years due to how they are forcing this through via budget reconciliation.
    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.

    -Kujako-

  20. #920
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Lenonis View Post
    Why is the mandate bad but forcing hospitals to treat the uninsured good? Why is forcing the insured to pay for the uninsured good?

    Still waiting for answers to those question from people who oppose the mandate.
    Gonna play devil's advocate here. I'm all for single payer healthcare, funded by taxes. But the way the mandate was done was wrong. It was basically forcing you to buy a product from a private company.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •