Trump's Deutsche Bank Records Said to Be Subpoenaed by Mueller

[NYC17]

It would be smart if Congress were to push for confining Mueller to simply investigate Russia and confine his inquiries to anything relating to that and nothing more. This has turned into a fishing expedition at this point, and I bet if we looked at Obama or Clinton with the same scrutiny we'd find ample malfeasance countless times worse. Indeed, the fact that Mueller's had to go so far outside his original purpose tells me Trump is more honest than I initially thought. Time to pull the plug on this Comey shill.

That's your bet? Worse "malfeasance"? You may want to stay away from gambling establishments. Or better yet, at least let me know where you plan on playing poker...

[Felya]

Say it with me... I know it’s hard for Trump’s defense team... because you know it’s bad... but...

Let them look, we support transparency, to show Trump has nothing to hide.

You can do it... I don’t even pretend to defend Trump and I could it.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Say it with me... I know it’s hard for Trump’s defense team... because you know it’s bad... but...

Let them look, we support transparency, to show Trump has nothing to hide.

You can do it... I don’t even pretend to defend Trump and I could it.

It's funny how Democrats always support investigations to find corruption, even in their own politicians. Meanwhile the Trumpkins screech and scream and make excuses for theirs.

Wonder why they can't just admit that corruption exists in the Republican ranks too, and that Trump is probably the most corrupt of all? Or at the very least, they could be fine with an investigation. Instead they stammer out lies and excuses.

[Poopymonster]

It's funny how Democrats always support investigations to find corruption, even in their own politicians. Meanwhile the Trumpkins screech and scream and make excuses for theirs.

Wonder why they can't just admit that corruption exists in the Republican ranks too, and that Trump is probably the most corrupt of all? Or at the very least, they could be fine with an investigation. Instead they stammer out lies and excuses.

I'm sure we'll investigate that fully, right after we do just ONE MORE peek into Mister Gazi...

[The Penguin]

That's your bet? Worse "malfeasance"? You may want to stay away from gambling establishments. Or better yet, at least let me know where you plan on playing poker...

The same day you have any sort of actual logic to your arguments. Haven't forgotten your insane defense of Trayvon Martin.

[Garnier Fructis]

The same day you have any sort of actual logic to your arguments. Haven't forgotten your insane defense of Trayvon Martin.

What about the other 2 or so people that made actual counterarguments to the same post?

[wunksta]

I thought Republicans loved investigations. They had so many with Benghazi.

[NYC17]

The same day you have any sort of actual logic to your arguments. Haven't forgotten your insane defense of Trayvon Martin.

You demand a logical rebuttal when you offer no indication you're capable of understanding logic. You literally stated that "you'd bet Obama and Hillary would have countless times worse malfeasance". That's based off your feels, and your feels aren't worth a shit.

As for Trayvon, any critical analysis you can provide of my opinion on the matter is rendered moot by your advocacy for the state "violently putting down rioters", of which you were sure there would be a countless number. This also speaks to your inability to apply logic to any meaningful degree. You can't forget something you never had a firm grasp of, so you're finally correct about something.

Kudos.

[shimerra]

The same day you have any sort of actual logic to your arguments. Haven't forgotten your insane defense of Trayvon Martin.

That's a very large rock you're preparing to throw as you stand for in your very shatterable glass house considering your post history. Investigations move beyond their original scope when evidence of wrong doing is found and a German bank known for laundering Russian money that has extensive dealings with TRump isn't this fishing expedition your partisan mind thinks it is.

Oh and Hillary was given the same level of scrutiny the difference is nothing was turned up. Trump got a special prosecutor b cause unlike Hillary or Obama your god king was stupid enough to interfere rather than let the investigation take its course. How many millions of dollars and years of investigating Hillary and whatd we get? Whole lotta nothing. Took 3 months of Trump being president for something to be found. Obamas entire presidency was republicans trying to find a noose to hang Obama with but they couldn't.

So turn off those partisan blinders and actually use logic like you claim you are.


Ooh and PS> anyone else remember who it was in the Trump admin using personal emails or devices to conduct official business for the government? Pretty sure penguin as on if the but her emails reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeers should be flipping a kid about that.

[Dontrike]

The same day you have any sort of actual logic to your arguments. Haven't forgotten your insane defense of Trayvon Martin.

What does Trayvon Martin or someone's defense of that whole topic have to do with this topic?

[cubby]

It would be smart if Congress were to push for confining Mueller to simply investigate Russia and confine his inquiries to anything relating to that and nothing more. This has turned into a fishing expedition at this point, and I bet if we looked at Obama or Clinton with the same scrutiny we'd find ample malfeasance countless times worse. Indeed, the fact that Mueller's had to go so far outside his original purpose tells me Trump is more honest than I initially thought. Time to pull the plug on this Comey shill.

You mean the "fishing" expedition that has already netted 2 guilty pleas and several indictments, all related to the election? That fishing expedition? Jesus, you Trumpkin apologists just can't get reality through your thick skulls.

We're taking your president from you, and it's because he's a horrible, unethical, treasonous idiot - not because of some made up shit you think someone did just because they're angry.

PAY ATTENTION

#deplorable45

[Stormspark]

You mean the "fishing" expedition that has already netted 2 guilty pleas and several indictments, all related to the election? That fishing expedition? Jesus, you Trumpkin apologists just can't get reality through your thick skulls.

We're taking your president from you, and it's because he's a horrible, unethical, treasonous idiot - not because of some made up shit you think someone did just because they're angry.

PAY ATTENTION

#deplorable45

It also means something that both guilty pleas were very obviously plea bargins. These are people that would've been looking at 30+ years for conspiracy, and they got off with a very light slap on the wrist, only being charged with perjury and a short jail term. There's no way Mueller would give Flynn that sweet of a deal unless he had something BIG.

The funny thing is, the paid shills are now saying "well they only charged Flynn with lying to the FBI, that means he didn't do anything worse than that". That's what a plea bargin is, you numbskulls.

[Breccia]

The funny thing is, the paid shills are now saying "well they only charged Flynn with lying to the FBI, that means he didn't do anything worse than that". That's what a plea bargin is, you numbskulls.

It's way up there with "he lied to the FBI, endangering his career, his money, and his family, but what he lied about wasn't even illegal so it's all okay, we're all okay, we didn't back a lying hypocrite criminal."

[cubby]

It also means something that both guilty pleas were very obviously plea bargins. These are people that would've been looking at 30+ years for conspiracy, and they got off with a very light slap on the wrist, only being charged with perjury and a short jail term. There's no way Mueller would give Flynn that sweet of a deal unless he had something BIG.

The funny thing is, the paid shills are now saying "well they only charged Flynn with lying to the FBI, that means he didn't do anything worse than that". That's what a plea bargin is, you numbskulls.

Lol, exactly. Couldn't agree more. The Trump shrills (and I use shrill, not shill - because I like double entendres) use such an enormous amount of energy to power up their willful ignorance - it's astounding.

[The Penguin]

I for one will laugh when or if Trump is not indicted and he pardons every one of them to send a message to the Liberals to stop being fail hards.

Seriously, between Moore, the collusion and everything else; your doing it wrong.

- - - Updated - - -

Why are you assuming the current charges and pleas have nothing to do with Russian meddling?

The right has used both governmental investigatory resources and private funds to find anything and everything untoward about Obama and Hillary. This is why you still bleat about "Killary Klinton", because there is nothing there.

Except I don't while you bray about Oppose, yet all you've done to date is dispose of Conyers, Franken and a couple other hacks.

Hrm. Here's a thought. Maybe you should try rhyming #resist with #desist. It might save you at mid-terms.

[Shadowferal]

Considering that Mueller has crossed Trump's little red-line...I don't think Trump is amused at all. It's like that little chip on Trump's shoulder was rudely knocked off and all he can do is...nothing.

[Garnier Fructis]

I for one will laugh when or if Trump is not indicted and he pardons every one of them to send a message to the Liberals to stop being fail hards.

Seriously, between Moore, the collusion and everything else; your doing it wrong.

If Trump were to pardon them, it would mean that they suddenly could not invoke the 5th amendment against self incrimination because they would not be able to incriminate themselves. So all the things that members of Trump's staff keep 'forgetting?' Suddenly they can't 'forget' them anymore, and it begs the question of why they were trying so hard to 'forget' these things in the first place.

Also, you're saying that you're going to laugh when the President pardons people who committed federal crimes because you want to send a message to your political opponents. You *do* realize how morally bankrupt that is, right?

[The Penguin]

Also, you're saying that you're going to laugh when the President pardons people who committed federal crimes because you want to send a message to your political opponents. You *do* realize how morally bankrupt that is, right?

No more bankrupt than what the Liberals have been doing for a full year now since they can't get over the fact that they lost the election.
I believe Obama justified his actions and antagonism to the other party, IE: John McCain by saying. "I won the election". Remember?

[Edge-]

No more bankrupt than what the Liberals have been doing for a full year now since they can't get over the fact that they lost the election.

Which is?...

[Garnier Fructis]

No more bankrupt than what the Liberals have been doing for a full year now since they can't get over the fact that they lost the election.
I believe Obama justified his actions and antagonism to the other party, IE: John McCain by saying. "I won the election". Remember?

You're comparing pardoning criminals to antagonism. It shouldn't need explaining why the former is way more morally bankrupt.