i'm sure there is another forum about this, i dont know. i didnt feel like looking through 100+ pages of hunter forums. but the other day on my druid i was doing LFR with a few of my friends, one of which was a hunter. now my friend plays the BM spec, shes incredibly attached to it and her pet to the point of NEVER using a different spec except once in wrath when her guild made her, threatening she couldnt do lich king if she wasnt MM. i've heard MM was the best spec for hunters in pve, pulling the most damage, being more mobile, and keeping steady dps. but she does pretty good dps as a BM, she keeps up with the top dps for most of the fight. but while in LFR she said some hunter whispered her telling her BM was the shittiest spec and in so many (mainly rude) words couldnt understand why she played it. it didnt seem to upset her, but it did raise some questions for me. what makes the BM spec so shitty? i also play a hunter, but mines just pvp so i dont think i have that great of pve knowledge on the hunter except basics. most of my pve experience is with her, and as i said she keeps up with top dps in fights. but like her, my hunter is also BM. and it does just fine in pvp. i often out live the other MM and surv hunters.
so in short..what is it that makes one hunter spec better than another? i mean actual information not "because ___ is just shitty". that doesnt really answer my question. im honestly curious. maybe we just play with shitty MM and survs, but the BM spec seems just fine to us.