1. #1

    PCIe Solid State Drives

    I just wanted to see this forum thinks of these. I also have to ask if there are any that are reasonably priced.

  2. #2
    I am Murloc! Fuzzykins's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,222
    I think they were made to bypass SATA 2 and never really caught on because we have SATA 3 now...

  3. #3
    I believe they are extremely fast and expensive.

  4. #4
    I am Murloc! Fuzzykins's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkshake86 View Post
    I believe they are extremely fast and expensive.
    Revodrive is no faster than a high end SATA SSD and significantly more expensive. Though that's just one example.

  5. #5
    The Lightbringer Kouki's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta Canada
    Posts
    3,629
    OCZ RevoDrive 240gig 280bucks.

    Its extreemly fast, the more expensive ones are nearly 2k and go as high as 500gigs.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Kouki View Post
    OCZ RevoDrive 240gig 280bucks.

    Its extreemly fast, the more expensive ones are nearly 2k and go as high as 500gigs.
    Well SATA III has 6 gb/s transfer rate, while PCIe 2.0 has a transfer rate of about 8 gb/s.

    However between Intel 510 250gb and OCZ Revodrive 240gb I think the OCZ takes the lead. OCZ might be a bit more expensive and a bit less storage, but the speeds of the OCZ would make it the better choice, right?

  7. #7
    I am Murloc! Cyanotical's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,553
    the better ones are 2-4 times faster then a sata3 SSD, but cost much more for that price, the fastest drive in the world is PCIe-x16, 6GB/s (yes Bytes)

    But most that are cheap enough for a consumer (ie <$1500) are terribly unreliable and have low MB compatibility

  8. #8
    I'm waiting for this
    http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product...82E16820227745

    to come down a bit, the speeds are unreal!

    These types of drives are often faster than 2 ssd's in raid, are more reliable(than most, intel is king here), and have a TRIM type support.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzykins View Post
    I think they were made to bypass SATA 2 and never really caught on because we have SATA 3 now...
    FusionIO ioDrive Octal

    Interface: PCI-Express x16 Gen2.0
    Available Capacities: 5.120TB
    Price: Contact FusionIO
    6000MB/s read
    4400MB/s write
    Random 512B Write: 1.18M IOPS

    O.o

  10. #10
    I am Murloc! Cyanotical's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,553
    Quote Originally Posted by moguri View Post
    FusionIO ioDrive Octal

    Interface: PCI-Express x16 Gen2.0
    Available Capacities: 5.120TB
    Price: Contact FusionIO
    6000MB/s read
    4400MB/s write
    Random 512B Write: 1.18M IOPS

    O.o
    and only for the low low price of $103,000.00 USD

  11. #11
    Titan
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    America's Hat
    Posts
    14,142
    Quote Originally Posted by moguri View Post
    FusionIO ioDrive Octal

    Interface: PCI-Express x16 Gen2.0
    Available Capacities: 5.120TB
    Price: Contact FusionIO
    6000MB/s read
    4400MB/s write
    Random 512B Write: 1.18M IOPS

    O.o
    Make a 750GB model and I would buy it up, that would load Steam games in an instant.

  12. #12
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Rennadrel View Post
    Make a 750GB model and I would buy it up, that would load Steam games in an instant.
    You have 750 gigs of steam games? :O

  13. #13
    Brewmaster Fierae's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northampton, UK
    Posts
    1,331
    PCIE SSDs are much quicker, and also much more expensive, no need for them in standard PC's I don't think.
    Digital Rumination
    Plays: Sylvanas EU - Fierae (Druid) | HotS | EVE | PUBG
    Played: Rift | Guild Wars 2 | SW:TOR | BF4 | Smite | LoL | Skyrim
    Ryzen 1920X - 32GB - 980Ti SLI - PCIE NVMe 1GB SSD - Enthoo Primo - Full WC - 4K

  14. #14
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Fierae View Post
    PCIE SSDs are much quicker, and also much more expensive, no need for them in standard PC's I don't think.
    Yeah, they're more aimed towards professionals who want very high data transfer rate. Like video editors.

  15. #15
    I am Murloc! Cyanotical's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhoodexe View Post
    Yeah, they're more aimed towards professionals who want very high data transfer rate. Like video editors.
    no, even the IO Duo is about $15,000, FusionIO drives are meant for VMware servers and datacenters, they are not really meant for workstations, and their steep price puts them way out of range for almost all enthusiasts

  16. #16
    Yeah, I agree these prices are a little out of the league for almost all enthusiasts. If there were more companies, there would be some competition and lower prices.

    Also THIS OCZ 3.2 TB makes me drool.

  17. #17
    I am Murloc! Cyanotical's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Linkedblade View Post
    Yeah, I agree these prices are a little out of the league for almost all enthusiasts. If there were more companies, there would be some competition and lower prices.

    Also THIS OCZ 3.2 TB makes me drool.
    well, when you consider that your average 5Tb SAN is $50K, and a 256Gb SSD cache system from dataram is another $65k, the fusionIO octal doesn't seem that bad, and it makes a huge improvement on virtualized environments

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhoodexe View Post
    You have 750 gigs of steam games? :O
    I've only had my gaming rig for about a year, and I'd wager I'm close to that with 100-150 games (not sure how many exactly). Think of all the games that take up between 10-20gb, and realize that at my lowest prediction (100 games) the average game only needs to take up 7.5 gb to meet that amount.

  19. #19
    The Lightbringer inux94's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Nuuk, Greenland
    Posts
    3,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Robinhoodexe View Post
    You have 750 gigs of steam games? :O
    Almost
    i7-6700k 4.2GHz | Gigabyte GTX 980 | 16GB Kingston HyperX | Intel 750 Series SSD 400GB | Corsair H100i | Noctua IndustialPPC
    ASUS PB298Q 4K | 2x QNIX QH2710 | CM Storm Rapid w/ Reds | Zowie AM | Schiit Stack w/ Sennheiser HD8/Antlion Modmic

    Armory

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •