Man, there really should have been an Xzibit cameo in Inception.
Well... that's just too good an exchange. I think I'll dream about Xzibit...
Wisconsin radio ad I heard today: "What? You mean I get to vote for Paul Ryan twice?"
It'd be funny if hearing it didn't make me think of the recorded PSAs from Bioshock.
Perhaps the ads are with the intention of raising more money to spend elsewhere. I don't where the numbers are, but there's some threshold where they'll gain more than they're spending from ads.
Maybe they want to make sure Romney wins the popular vote. 2000 in reverse?
That's why Massachusetts is going to vote for the Republican Presidential ticket for the first time since Reagan, right?
That's how great he is.
To some, Romney will be the President from heaven. This group includes poor people who have been brainwashed by Fox News and rich people who think cutting and/or halting introduction of basic services is justified if it lets them increase their wealth even more (people who want to "keep their money" - Refer to my sig for more info).
I think I don't need to explain why as far as this one goes.
A 'birther' on mmo-champ? I don't believe it. Thanks for the laughs I guess.
Fun fact:
If Romney wins the election, America will have 6 living presidents for only the second period of time in history. (Carter, Bush41, Clinton, Bush43, Obama, Romney) Currently, the only time this has happened was the period from 1992-1994 (Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton). Nixon died April 22nd, 1994.
MMO-C nightly hockey chat http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=#mmoc-hockey
Well when i talk about his lack of experience, im mostly talking about how little he had done for Illinois. Running the state into the ground. Holding a seat for years, and fucking up along the way, but not learning anything does not equal experience, because the same shit happened when he moved to a national level. He was an absentee senator that cared more about progressing his presidential aspirations than caring for the people he represented.
No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.
So, when you say, "zero experience", what you really mean is, "less experience that I'd consider optimal". That's playing pretty fast and loose with terms. Generally, "zero" should mean, "absolutely none", not just "not as much as I'd like".
When you say, "not learning anything", is this equally loose?