Last edited by apepi; 2012-10-23 at 05:02 AM.
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
No he wouldn't that share of the vote. They oppose Obama for many reasons.
And besides, getting an extra 0.5% of the vote while losing who knows how much for being perceived as weak or else an ally of the terrrorists by Fox et al for taking war as an option off the table won't help him much.
NEVER take any option off the table unless you negotiate getting something in return. Obama should have learned that from negotiating with the terrorists--er, I mean Republicans--over things like health care reform or deficit reduction. When faced with a threat the use of physical force should be an option. The last option mind you, but still an available option.
---------- Post added 2012-10-23 at 01:12 PM ----------
There really is not much the US should (or even can) do to help it aside from fixing their own economy.
I dont have to show you anything. You're the one that made the claim that people only vote for Ron Paul because they want 'legal weed' and think less taxes equals 'magical prosperity.' Back up your claim with facts instead of conjecture.
Here I'll even help. Do you see any kind of platform beyond 'legalizing drugs, cutting taxes, and slashing the federal government so much that it literally crumbles'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politic...ns_of_Ron_Paul
It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
Many of the people who are for Johnson in particular do it because he's the best (of the three) when it comes to civil liberties. Stop spying on Americans without warrant, restore due process, get rid of the patriot act, TSA, things like that.
Also, those who want to slow down or dismantle the war on drugs aren't just pot smokers. The war on drugs, especially under Obama, is taking a significant toll on the economy and is waged by infringing upon civil liberties. It also reduces safety.
Last edited by mmoc43ae88f2b9; 2012-10-23 at 02:53 PM.
Obama has accelerated the war on drugs. They use more wiretaps (without warrant ofcourse), have more funding, weapons, raids etc than before. Also, more Medical Marijuana dispensaries have been raided and shut down by the Feds than before, even as these were legal under state law.
And the problem with cracking down on the illegal side of narcotics, is that people who have done nothing wrong get hurt by these warrantless wiretaps and raids on wrong houses etc. The problem with cracking down on the legal side of narcotics (like medical marijuana dispensaries) is probably obvious.
Oh please..... since when does Obama supersede legislative law? The restriction against medical marijuana on a federal level is a stated law that the FDA is required to follow by congress. If anything, Obama has reduced the war on drugs by issuing unofficial statements to agents to prioritize all other cases above anyone using medical marijuana with a prescription.
Obama isn't some omnipotent octopus moving every hand of the federal government. His role is restricted to that of the executive branch.
To expand on this, and show that Obama is in fact going in the opposite direction that you believe: http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-on-drugs.html
Last edited by Kasierith; 2012-10-23 at 03:37 PM.
But, that ignores that there are far more dispensaries out now than any time from when the law started. Saying he closed down more dispensaries, is also a reflection of how many and how open they are. There are far more dispensaries now, than ever before. They didn't have this many pot stores when the shit was legal. I live in Seattle and for the last couple of years, we have had ads in local news papers for them. We had raids, but ones that seem to only target those that break other ordinance. Raids that don't even hit half of the places that operate in the open. If you think things have gotten worse or even espeacialy worse under Obama, you are ignoring reality.
because it's bullshit. they dont actually make anything safer, if you've been through american airports lately the TSA comes across as a jobs program for people that are unemployable in the best of economies. there is a serious problem with oversight, and they are apparently unanswerable to anybody. airport personnel are not able to take complaints about TSA, they have to refer you to TSA's site, which, surprise surprise, has no means of taking complaints or feedback (my mom just went through this). there have been incidents of TSA men patting down women they find attractive. when the women ask for a woman agent for the pat down they are told that one would not be available for half an hour or more, and end up consenting to being groped.
tldr: poor/no oversight, agents not qualified to wield a toilet brush let alone authority, doesnt actually increase security