1. #1501
    I am Murloc!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    5,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Tech614 View Post
    Umm that gif is a direct feed from the ps3 version running.

    The character models DO look that good.

    These are all taken from a ps3 by fans, these aren't bullshots from trailers. Either your TV sucks or you have a shoddy memory. The game flat out destroys anything on the ps4 in graphical fidelity atm, the only things even close are Infamous and Ryse.(as I noted already it has an easier time getting there then other games as the game requires little AI, no physics and is built in smaller contained levels, not massive open worlds)
    still 0 background in those pic. yes they do look good, but those are precalculated facial cinematic.
    It's a different category than gameplay footage from a last of us, metro last light or the future watch dogs.

    That being said, coming back to GTA5 (since the thread is about GTA5) this kind of facial detail is not possible given the size of the open world game.

    Beyond two souls is a game that almost solely depends on its story and storytelling effect. GTA, watch dogs, last of us rely more on actual game play. The emphasis are not the same in both game.

  2. #1502
    Quote Originally Posted by Vankrys View Post
    still 0 background in those pic. yes they do look good, but those are precalculated facial cinematic.
    It's a different category than gameplay footage from a last of us, metro last light or the future watch dogs.

    That being said, coming back to GTA5 (since the thread is about GTA5) this kind of facial detail is not possible given the size of the open world game.

    Beyond two souls is a game that almost solely depends on its story and storytelling effect. GTA, watch dogs, last of us rely more on actual game play. The emphasis are not the same in both game.
    Umm there is no backgrounds because the pics are zoomed in on the faces, the faces remained that detail no matter the background you would know this if you actually played the game. For the record all the backgrounds in Beyond look as good as the faces with the exception of one. Only the desert area has graphics that at some time lose that level of detail, everything else in the game is near photo realistic from a distance.

    I have also already stated the reasons it is easier for Beyond to look better then other games. Being easier to render graphics doesn't mean it should blow everything else out of the water(including stuff on much, much more superior hardware) though which it does.
    Last edited by Tech614; 2014-04-16 at 10:29 AM.

  3. #1503
    I am Murloc!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    5,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Tech614 View Post
    Being easier to render graphics doesn't mean it should blow everything else out of the water(including stuff on much, much more superior hardware) though which it does.
    I don't think so. PS3 is (was) a good machine, but nowhere near what PC or the next gen console is capable. that game is like an interactive movie fully produced in motion capture, its main argument is depiction of the story so the quality of the picture is essential.

    it may not be possible for current gen and PC to have a third person game (such as tomb raider or last of us) to have that level of facial detail, regardless of being developed by quantic dream, crystal dynamics or naughty dogs.

    However, if such game (similar to B2S) existed on PC, i guaranty the PC version would blow out of the water (as you say) a ps3 version, if anything, by virtue of being 1080p or even 1440p which becoming more and more common as better PC graphic card and monitor becoming attainable.

    Thankfully enough, such game are minority, and developer still favors actual gameplay, in video games.

  4. #1504
    Deleted
    Confirmed for PS4, Xbox One and PC this fall:



    Looks amazing on the PS4

  5. #1505
    Hell, it's about time.

  6. #1506
    Hopefully it'll be more optimized than GTA IV was.
    "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance

  7. #1507
    I am Murloc!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    5,923
    max payne 3 did run ok, so there's hope.
    Last edited by Vankrys; 2014-06-10 at 03:21 PM.

  8. #1508
    Elemental Lord Tekkommo's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    8,054
    I'm hoping there will be added content from the PS3 version.

    For example, the casino will be open.

  9. #1509
    The Unstoppable Force Orange Joe's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    001100010010011110100001101101110011
    Posts
    23,080
    Still no heists?

  10. #1510
    I am Murloc! Mister K's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Under your desk
    Posts
    5,629
    Weheeee, can't wait. Ever since I first heard about it I was ultra excited. I have heard that there is a video software coming with it (PC)? Maybe the comment made by that poster was just BS :/

    Adding trailer into the OP.
    -K

  11. #1511
    The Unstoppable Force Orange Joe's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    001100010010011110100001101101110011
    Posts
    23,080
    Extremely disappointed with rockstar atm. They should finish the game the sold last year rather than trying to resell a unfinished gamed.



    Where the hell are the heists they promised months ago?

  12. #1512
    Quote Originally Posted by Baar View Post
    Extremely disappointed with rockstar atm. They should finish the game the sold last year rather than trying to resell a unfinished gamed.



    Where the hell are the heists they promised months ago?
    GTA is and always has been a singleplayer game period. Any addition of a multiplayer is not even close to thier priority and is just an added bonus.

  13. #1513
    The Unstoppable Force Orange Joe's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    001100010010011110100001101101110011
    Posts
    23,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeta333 View Post
    GTA is and always has been a singleplayer game period. Any addition of a multiplayer is not even close to thier priority and is just an added bonus.


    Then they shouldn't advertise it as such. Heists(and online play in general) were very much hyped for this game. Needless to say I won't be rushing to buy anymore of their games after this. I'll wait to see if they finish them before I buy it.

  14. #1514
    Elemental Lord Tekkommo's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    8,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Baar View Post
    Then they shouldn't advertise it as such. Heists(and online play in general) were very much hyped for this game. Needless to say I won't be rushing to buy anymore of their games after this. I'll wait to see if they finish them before I buy it.
    Well considering the single player game was fucking awesome, it makes it ok in my eyes.

    They probably didn't realise how hard it is to make an online game.

  15. #1515
    I am Murloc! Mister K's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Under your desk
    Posts
    5,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeta333 View Post
    GTA is and always has been a singleplayer game period. Any addition of a multiplayer is not even close to thier priority and is just an added bonus.
    We will probably see modders pick it up and improve multiplayer. SAMP is still the bomb after a really, long, long period.
    -K

  16. #1516
    Deleted
    I hope it fails to sell on the pc.

    They seriously deserve that after a year of waiting since the console release.

    I dont care if its the last release of GTA on pc ever, as long as they learn from thinking they can release it a year later.

  17. #1517
    Quote Originally Posted by Zabusasan View Post
    I hope it fails to sell on the pc.

    They seriously deserve that after a year of waiting since the console release.

    I dont care if its the last release of GTA on pc ever, as long as they learn from thinking they can release it a year later.
    I think that is kind of a fair sentiment, though I would say it depends on the quality of the port. I would happily wait a year for a good port.

  18. #1518
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Afrospinach View Post
    I think that is kind of a fair sentiment, though I would say it depends on the quality of the port. I would happily wait a year for a good port.
    Should have been made for the PC first and then downgraded to consoles imo

  19. #1519
    Quote Originally Posted by Zabusasan View Post
    I hope it fails to sell on the pc.

    They seriously deserve that after a year of waiting since the console release.

    I dont care if its the last release of GTA on pc ever, as long as they learn from thinking they can release it a year later.
    Won't matter, they made their money. No need to get upset over developers decisions based on what they're comfortable with. Going to get mad at Bungie for discontinueing Halo for the PC?

  20. #1520
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by kail View Post
    Won't matter, they made their money. No need to get upset over developers decisions based on what they're comfortable with. Going to get mad at Bungie for discontinueing Halo for the PC?
    Thats not even remotely the same thing tho :/

    I would, as i allready said, be fine with them discontinuing gta for pc forever. Then at least we know not to expect it. But making ppl wait a year for a port is insanely stupid and honestly its taking a dump on your pc community.

    Halo is a shit game, nothing about that game can make me mad :P

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •