What Cameron is doing takes balls and it's good that someone takes the iniative, but did you even read the article? It says right there that someone did close to the same dive, they weren't able to document much of it, which is why it's great that with newer technology someone is taking iniative to go down and explore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathyscaphe_Trieste
is the deepest anyone has ever gone in the ocean, and its the only manned mission to ever do so sucessfully
Which was in 1960s, 50 damn years ago (round number), easily doable with todays technology. Sure James will, he has the money to get the best equipment.
---------- Post added 2012-03-10 at 12:09 PM ----------
One to each of their own, there is nothing on the moon, maybe moon mining would be interesting to see what we could find but apart from that nothing special. Oh and yes I love space, im more of a space "geek" my self but going to the bottom of the sea is kind of more interesting then the moon. Now planet exploration, now that is interesting.
-K
Exactly, but to each their own. Some could care less about species they'll never see, not even in an aquamarine, but it's always interesting to see the things we're sharing this planet with, and the fact that we know of the moon's surface more than what's in the seas and oceans. They're vast, huge, always changing. Even the smallest creatures are amazing, like the little fish they found that lives 5 miles below the surface and could fit in the palm of your hand, while surviving the immense pressure.
Well, it was a space race for a reason. In the 60's no one knew what was on the moon, aliens, life, anything, nothing? And man just being man, USA vs Russia, both wanted to be the first man on the moon, accomplishments. Man being where he shouldn't be. Now we just have telescopes sent into space showing us the beauty of what is out there, and us knowing that there's nothing on the moon, have no reason to go back, unless of course they want to build moon bases.
That's not quite true. There are indeed vast swaths of the ocean floor that are extremely barren, but there are also many parts of the deep sea that are comparatively teeming with life. New species really ARE discovered almost every time one of these expeditions sets out. We've explored a fraction of a fraction of part of the deep sea, there's a huge amount we know virtually nothing about.
A quick google search gave me a new discovery as early as a couple days ago. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...agos-catshark/
Catsharks are found in temperate and tropical seas worldwide, ranging from very shallow intertidal waters to depths of 2,000 metres (6,600 ft) or more, depending on species
if that's the same shark, thats hardly deep sea. well it is technically deep sea, but i'm refering more to the deepest part of the trench.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1015191723.htm
At 7000 meters.
Not exactly a barren wasteland. Life finds a way~Mass groupings of cusk-eels and large crustacean scavengers were also discovered living at these depths for the first time.
Like I said, we know so very little about the deep abyss.Furthermore, it is now apparent that each of the deep trenches across the globe hosts a unique assembly of animals which can differ greatly from trench to trench. The immense isolation of each trench draws parallels with island evolution theory popularised by Darwin's finches.
What are you talking about? They went to the bottom of challenger deep in 1960...
ok. thats all well and good. But the deepest part of the ocean is substantially deeper.
"It reaches a maximum-known depth of about 10.91 kilometres (6.78 mi) (35,800 ft)"
at least 3,000 kilometers deeper than where that was found. which is pretty freakin huge. yes there are things found in floors far higher up than where this trench is, but i really doubt anything will be found in this trench.
A fen strider from Zangarmarsh?!
There was an interview with one of the people that went to the bottom, and he said that he did see some sort of flat fish at the bottom before the sand was kicked up. It would be extremely interesting to see what's down there, and if it could be done 60 years ago it should be piss easy by now, we have SCIENCE!