
Originally Posted by
Endus
Of course it is. It isn't possible to do a comparison that is both clear, concise, and legitimate. Any 2 of the 3, sure, but not all 3; if you go into enough detail for clarity in a thorough enough manner to be legitimate, it will not be concise.
That wasn't the point. The point was people make up distinctions, exactly as I had to for that particular list there, but they artificially draw the lines on their lists in such a way as to exclude the majority of the Shaman's tools. It's a deliberately unfair pattern of argument.
The point was never that Elemental Shaman are somehow "better" defensively than Mages. Mages have great defenses. I think that lists shows that. But Elemental has a lot of powerful tools too. They aren't the same as a Mage's, because we're not Mages. Everyone has different ability layouts. I absolutely don't agree that the MoP Elemental ability lists leaves us shortchanged for defenses. On the contrary, I look at that list and I see a heck of a lot of strength. Better than everyone else? Probably not. Strong enough to be a contender? That's my argument. The Shaman portfolio is a bit more active than most classes; you can't just freak out and jab your panic button when you screw up like a Mage hitting Iceblock. I don't see that as a negative, though, it just means we have a higher skill quotient, and I'm absolutely fine with that (and I'm not saying mages are "easier", either, just that Iceblock is an "easy" defensive tool).